Skip to main content

Full text of "What relation, if any, is there between religious teachings and social and civic conduct?"

See other formats


BOSTON  UNIVERSITY 
SCHOOL  OF  SDUCATIO^J 


Thesis 


7;HAT  relation,  if  Ai^iY,  IS  THERE  BETWEEN 
RELIGIOUS  TEACniilGS  AliD  SOCIAL  Ai.T  CIVIC  COIiDUCT? 


Submitted  by 


Ruth  Carleton  Beckford 
(3.S.  in- Ed.,  Salem  Normal  School,  1928) 


In  partial  fulf ilLiae.it  of  requirements  for  the  degree  of 

Master  of  Education 


TABLE  OF  CO  i\i  TENTS 


Preface 

Book  One 
Is  Our  Inquiry  Significant? 

Chapter  One  -  Page  1 

Tihat  Aakes  a  Thing  Significant 

Chapter  Two  4 
YVhere  Shall  V.e  Fin'd  Evidence? 

Chapter  Three  6 
Understanding  our  Terms:    Religious  Teachings 

Chapter  Four  10 
Understanding  c.r  Ter.ns:     bocial  and  Civic  Conduct 

Book  Two 
The  Psychological  Vievirpoint 

Chapter  Five  20 
What  Psychologists  Say 

Book  Three 

Surveys  of  Agencies  biving  Religious  Teaching 

Chapter  Six  30 
Purpose  of  the  Survey 

Chapter  Seven  51 
The  Church — vihat  is  it  Doing? 

Chapter  Sight  50 
The  Public  School — V.iiat  is  it  Doing? 

Chapter  liine  54 
The  Private  School — What  is  it  Doing? 

Chapter  Ten  59 
Y*hat  is  Being  Done  Through  Other  Agencies? 

Cliapter  Eleven  62 
Measuring  the  Results  of  Religious  Teachings 

BoOiC  Four 

An  Analysis  of  the  Specific  Civic  Conduct  Shortage 
— Lac-;  of  Respect  for  Law. 

Chapter  Twelve  75 
The  Present  Situation 


Chapter  Thirteen 

Causes  of  Lawlessness 


C'.:apter  Fourteen 

Can  Religious  Teachings  Eliminate  This  Shortage 

Chapter  Fifteen 

A  Summary  and  Some  Conclusions 

Bibliography 


P  R  S  i?'  A  C  S 


Probably  there  is  no  cthsr  one  subject  about  which 
people  speculate  more  and  really  think  less,  than  this 
matter  of  religious  teaching,  as  related  to  right  living. 
You  will  find  opinions  ranging  all  the  way  from  those  who 
affirm  comfortably  th.:;t  religious  teaching  has  always  been, 
is  now  and  ever  shall  be,  the  one  sure  and  effective  .neans  of 
making  people  "good"  (whatever  they  may  mean  by  that  much 
abused  word)  to  those  who  mockingly  point  to  the  anti-social 
practices  ind  :lged  in  by  professed  religionists,  as  the  final 
procf  tliat  such  teachings  are  valueless. 

Is  t:.ere  any  way  in  which  v/e  can  disentangle  from 
the  oass  of  opinions,  any  reliable  information  that  would 
give  us  some  valia  conclusioas  on  this  matter  of  the  real 
value  of  this  factor  -  f  religious  teac'-dng?    To  attempt  to  do 
this,  so  that  we  as  educators  .'nay  know  where  bo  stand  on  the 
quesoion,  is  the  purpcse  of  this  t  .'esis.    The  difficulty  lies 
not  in  the  fact  that  there  is  not  abundant  laaterial  at  hand  to 
investigate-  quite  the  contrary — its  very  abundance  makes  it 
difficult  to  "boil  it  dov/n"  and  present  the  essential  infor.'aa.tion 
in  a  not  too  lengtl:^  form. 

In  order  to  avoid  having  it  seem  just  another  opinion 
I  tried  to  include  enough  :  actual  evidence  to  support  wj  con- 
clusions, but  it  was  impossible  to  give  asmuch  as  I  could  have 
wished.    I  have  accordingly  included  a  bibliography  which  deals 
more  extensively  with  each  problem  brought  up  in  each  section 
so  that  further  reading  may  be  done. 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 
in  2014 


https://archive.org/details/whatrelationifanOObeck 


BOOK  ONE 


IS  OUR  INQUIRY  SIGNIFICANT? 


Chapter  *^ne 
Y/hat  Malces  a  Thing  S.Lgnif icant? 

•^ne  of  the  great  defects  of  present  day  educational 
endeavor,  according  to  Snedden,  is  the  tendenc:;  of  schools 
prematurely  to  attempt  to  achieve  educational  results  that 
quite  naturally  weald  come  through  extra  school  agencies  if 
the  school  had  not  made  any  effort.    There  seems  to  be  an 
imolication  here  that  schoolmen  are  too  prone  to  chase 
educational  butterflies,  without  first  giving  sufficient 
thought  to  the  value  of  the  thing  oursued.    They  should 
rather  stop  and  ask  themselves  "Is  th&t  sometliing  that  is 
significant  for  us  as  educators,  and  if  significant  must  we 
take  care  of  it  or  Cc-n  it  be  handled  just  as  effectively 
by  some  other  agencies?" 

In  of  the  fact  tliat  our  present  educational 

system  is,  according  to  many  authorities,  becoming  positive- 
ly tangled  up  v/ith  the  many  additions  to  its  work,  then  it 
would  seem  that  we  as  educators  would  do  well  before  attack- 
ing a  new  problem,  to  ask  ourselves  the  prop  sed  question — 
"Is  it  significant?" 

Let  us  put  to  this  test  a  problem  which  more  and 
more  we  are  hearing  discussed  today,  and  see  v/hether  it 
holds  anything  that  sho!^ld  challenge  our  thinking.    It  is 
the  problem  of  v/hether  or  not  there  is  any  relation  between 
religious  teaciiing  and  social  and  civic  conduct,  and  if  so 
is  this  of  any  impcrtance  to  us — should  we  do  anytliing  about 
it? 


In  a  country ' established  upon  the  principle  of 
entire  separation  of  church  and  state,  it  would  seem  at 
first  thought  that  the    ublic  schools,  founded  primarily  to 
insure  good  citizens  for  this  state,  could  have  nothing  to 
do  with  religious  teaching,  which  is  generally  accepted  as 
being  the  special  care  of  the  church.* 

Yet,  does  not  this  very  fact  that  one  of  the  great 
reasons  for  the  existance  of  the  public  schools  is  the  making 
of  good  citizens,  make  this  problem  a  significant  one  for 
educators  to  face,  for  many  people  today  are  insisting  that 
in  order  to  realize  this  aim  v;e  must,  in  sor."e  v/ay,  "put  God 
in  the  picture  of  American  life." 

Athearn,  in  his  book,  "Character  Buildinr  in  a 
Democracy"  goes  as  far  as  to  say  "Democracy  will  not  be  sefe 
for  the  world  until  democrats  learn  how  to  make  secular  and 
religious  education  efficient  and  iiniversal .  "^'Ht 

History  furnishes  us  with  too  many  examples  of 
Godless  countries  ending  in  tragedy,  to  m&ke  us  feel  tha.t 
men  can  learn  to  "live  together  well  in  large  group  relation- 
ships", without  this  element  in  their  lives. 

it  would  seem,  then,  measured  by  the~yardstick  of 
significance,  that  here  is  a  problem  with  vfhich,  sooner  or 
later,  educators  must  come  to  grips,  if  they  are  to  carry 
out  the  function  of  Tnaking  those  good  citizens,  which  here 

^    Encyclical  on  Ec^jication  of  Women  issued  by  Pope  Pius  XI 
January  19,  1951 

Athearn.    Character  Building  in  a  Democracy    P.  21 


-5- 

in  our  democratic  America,  we  say  we  must  have  in  order  to 
carry  on. 


Chapter  Two 
V/here  Shall  le  Find  Evidence? 

Quite  naturally  the  next  question  to  arise  v/ould 
be  "Is  there  any  foundati_pn  for  this  belief  that  religion 
plays  a  vital  part  in  the  life  of  our  nation?"    TVhere  can  v/e 
find  any  evidence  to  substantiate  this  feeling? 

Even  a  hasty  glance  at  the  abundance  of  material 
available,  dealing  with  this  problem,  leaves  us  with  the 
impression  that  there  must  be  something  more  to  tliis  question 
than  we  had,  perhaps,  thought. 

Probably  most  interesting  to  us  as  teachers,  is 
the  attitude  of  psychologists  on  this  question.    While  still 
a  comparatively  new  study,  psychology  has  demonstrated  that 
it  can  do  much  to  help  us  in  meeting  our  teaching  problems 
and  so  it  is  only  natural  that  we  should  turn  to  it  in  this 
instance  to  see  whether  it  can  shed  any  light  on  this 
particular  problem. 

Another  source  of  information  would  seem,  per- 
haps, to  those  who  are  pragmatically  inclined,  to  be  even 
more  indicative  of  the  importance  of  this  problem.    If  we 
were  to  make  a  study  of  the  agencies  giving  religious  teaching 
see  what  they  are  offering,  measure  their  civic  and  social 
values,  we  mii:ht  arrive  at  some  conclusions  which  would  in- 
dicate their  possibilities  as  factors  in  developing  a 
better  attitude. 


Even  more  of  a  test  would  be  an  examination  of 
any  surveys  that  had  been  made  to  try  and  ascertain  whether 
or  not  these  teachings  had  resulted  in  more  valuable  con- 
duct.   Fortunately  some  of  these  tests,  though  still  in  a 
very  exj:erimental  stage,  have  been  developed,  and  used,  so 
that  we  have  available  some  data  on  the  actual  results  of 
such  teachings. 

Let  us  turn  to  these  tv/o  sources  then,  and  see  what 
they  hold  for  us. 


Chapter  Three 
Understanding  our  Terms :  Religious  Teachings 

Someone  has  aptly  said  that  at  best  words  are  but 
cliansy  carriers  of  thought,  for  they  mean  so  many  different 
things  to  different  people.    Even  when  Y7e  are  dealing  with 
concrete  and  common  things,  it  is  so  easy  to  be  misunder- 
stood and  misinterpreted,    ^t  would  seem  very  essential, 
therefore,  that  before  proceeding  further  in  our  in- 
vestigation we  try  to  make  very  clear  just  what  we  mean 
when  we  so  glibly  use  the  terms  "religious  teacliings" 
and  "social  and  civic  conduct."    Just  what  is  this  thing 
that  we  thinlc  Trill  be  beneficial  and  just  what  is  the 
effect  we  think  it  should  produce? 

Religious  teaching — so  often  said  and  so  little 
understood.    Vvhen  vie  try  to  define  it  it  probably  is  one  of 
the  most  elusive  words  v;e  know — Religion.    Too  often  in 
the  popular  mind  it  is  synonymous  with  "theology",  en- 
tangled with  doctrinal  meanings  and  conceptions.    Yet  it 
is  almost  the  entire  opposite  of  that. 

In  January,  1916,  the  National  Education 
Association  published  a  monogxaph,  dealing  with  "The 
Essential  Place  of  Religion  in  Education"  in  v/hich  they 
recognize  this  difficulty.*  "Much  of  the  conf'i.sicn  arises 
from  v.'hat  Jsones  calls  a  kind  of  'mental  blindness',    ^t  is 


*    Section  One.    Monograph  pu  lished  by  N.E.A.,  January, 
1916,  "The  Essential  Place  of  Religion  in  Education" 


hard  to  express  in  vrords  what  we  mean.    Religion  is  not 
sometliing  that  can  be  made  the  object  of  study  as  can 
spelling,  for  instojice.    Religious  education  is  not  in- 
struction in  the  Bible,  valuable  as  that  is.    It  is  not  a 

body  of  doctrine,  it  is  not  a  philosophy  or  even  theology. 
If  it  is  not  a  body  of  objects  and  practices,  if  it  is  not 
a  body  of  doctrines  and  dogmas,  v/hat  is  it?    Religion  may 
be  clumsily  defined  as  the  'life  of  God  in  the  soul  of  man.' 

We  find  that  this  view-  is  echoed  by  many  edu- 
cators writing  on  this  subject.    Betts  feels  that  "it  takes 
the  child,  endcv/ed  as  he  is  with  capacities  for  both  evil 
and  ^ood  and  seeks  to  stimulate  the  good  and  suppress  the 
bad."*    "It  is  the  systematic  examination  and  recon- 
struction of  relations  betvtoen  j^ersons,  guided  by  Jesus' 
assumption  that  persons  are  of  infinite  worth,  and  by  the 
hypothesis  of  the  existance  of  God,  the  great  Valuer  of 
persons",  says  G.  A.  Coe  in  discussing  the  question  "What  is 
Christian  Education" In  another  place  he  asserts  that 
"education  refers  to  the  goal  of  life — whatever  that  goal 
may  be — the  true  end  of  teaching  is  one  with  the  true  end 
of  life — according  to  our  conception  of  the  meaning  of 
life  will  be  our  conception  of  the  meaning  of  education — 
if  we  feel  that  complete  life  must  include  not  only  man's 


■^G.  K.  Betts,  The  Ne..  Program  of  Religious  Education,  P.  40 
What  is  Christian  Education,    G.  A,  Coe.    P.  296 


relation  to  l:iis  fellowmen  but  also  fellowship  with  God, 
then  we  must  provide  for  the  development  of  this  as  we 
would  for  the  social  nature  to  develop — this  is  the  task  of 
religious  education .  "-^^ 

Nicholas  Murray  Butler  gives  a  little  different 
angle  to  the  situation  when  he  expresses  it  as  a  phcise  of 
education  whf.reby  the  religious  heritage  is  passed  on  to  a 
person  and  without  which  he  can  not  be  said  to  be  completely 
educated.-^^- 

These  and  many  other  examples  all  tend  to  the 
same  conclusion  and  seem  to  be  aptly  summed  up  in  the  Vi'ords 
of  a  well  iOioT.Ti  English  bishop  who  said  that  "while  theology 
is  a  science  and  can  be  ai-gued,  religion  is  a  life  and  can 
only  be  lived." 

It  is  tliis  idea  that  differentiates  religious 
teaching  from  "moral"  or  "ethical"  instruction — as  if  it 
were  the  dynjonic  which  gives  pov^er  and  appeal  to  the 
teachings  of  moral  and  ethical  value. 

Mathew  Arnold  has  said  that  religion  is  "morality 
lit  up  with  emotion,"    Expanding  that  thought  re  might  say 
that  any  teachings  which  seek  to  motivate  what  are  generally 
recognized  as  moral  values,  by  furnishing  an  emotional 
drive  that  will  be  strong  enough  to  translate  the  moral 


*    G.  A.  Coe,  "Education  in  Religion  and  Morals,  P.  1 
N.  M.  Butler,  "The  Meaning  of  Education    P.  177-200 


knowledge  into  action,  may  be  said  to  be  religious  teaching 

The  idea  of  emotion  here  seems  to  be  that  of 
"feeling" — tioat  is  a  dynamic  that  has  passed  beyond  the 
bounds  of  reason  or  thinking  and  whose  motive  pov/er  comes 
from  a  faith  in  and  desire  to  work  in  iiarmony  with  a  Some- 
tliing  Beyond  Onete  Self  (whether  we  call  that  Power,  God, 
Father,  Supreme  Being,  or  eveii  Universal  Force,  does  not 
alter  the  essential  nature  of  the  feeling)  which  irapells 
us  to  bring  our  conduct  in  line  with  the  moral  values  that 
our  group  recognises  as  vital  to  its  welfare. 


-10- 

Chapter  Four 
Understanding  Our  Terms:    Social  and  Civic  Conduct 

Probably  just  as  difficult  to  define  in  a  specific 
way,  is  the  other  factor  in  our  problem — if  asked  to  give 
specific  qualities,  few  people  would  agree  on  just  vfhat  con- 
stituted good  social  and  civic  conduct.    Opinions  would  run 
the  \vhole  gamut  from  those  who  hold  absolute  and  un- 
swerving obedience  to  law  as  the  final  criterion  of  good  con- 
duct, to  those  who  feel  that  he  who  acts  in  accordance  with 
what  seems  to  him,  after  intelligent  consideration,  to  be 
for  the  best  good  of  his  fellovraien,  should  receive  the 
higher  commendation. 

There  is  undoubtedly  one  definition  of  this 
elusive  factor  to  which  everyone  would  subscribe:  good 
social  and  civic  conduct  is  that  action  which  would  enable 
people  to  live  together  in  harmony,  carrying  on  tliat  our- 
posef^ol,  co-orful  and  intelligent  activity  by  which 
everyone,  thinking  of  the  welfare  of  the  group,  would  find 
their  greatest  happiness  and  possibilities  for  greatest 
individual  development  through  doing  such  things  as  would 
make  for  the  happiness  of  the  gToup. 

But,  like  all  such  definitions  this  one  is  of 
very  little  real  value  for,  dealing  in  glittering  generalities 
as  it  does,  it  does  not  help  us  to  know  what  we  can  specifi- 
cally do  to  achieve  'these  much  to  be  desired  results. 


Is  not  that  our  keynote  in  attempting  to  arrive 
at  a  definition  of  what  constitutes  good  social  and  civic 
conduct — what  specific  things  does  it  involve?    Vvith  this 
idea  in  mind  let  us  examine  a  few  of  the  many  attempts  to 
define  this  characteristic  and  measuring  them  ag' inst  the 
criterion  of  specificness  see  if  we  can  not  secure  a  workable 
definition,  which  will  give  us  in  definite  terms  a  picture 
of  just  Y;hat  this  thing  is. 

Some  people  feel  that  one  of  the  best  ways  to 
arrive  at  an  obscure  and  hard-to-def ine  meaning  is  by  the 
process  of  elira  nation — tell  what  it  is  not  and  you  will 
find  what  it  is.    While  this  method  does  not  always  work, 
but  frequently  ends  in  a  vagueness  as  disappointing  as  the 
first  stage  of  questioning,  yet  it  is  helpful  in  a  measure. 
One  such  definition  of  good  civic  conduct  is  built  up  in 
just  this  way. 

One  author  questions  the  much  lauded  civic  virtue 
of  patriotism — v/hich  many  people  have  felt  was  one  very  im- 
portant phase  of  good  conduct,  civically  speaking.  His 
feeling  is  that  patriotism  does  not  necessarily  connote 
good  conduct — that  a  person  may  have  a  great  love  for  his 
CAjjitTy  (which  is  the  usual  definition  of  patriotism)  and 
yet  engage  in  many  practices  which  are  distinctly  not  for 
the  good  of  the  countiy.    His  implication  is  that  love  it- 
self is  not  enough-    Just  as  a  Mother,  though  she  may  love 
her  child  above  all  else,  might  through  ignorance,  give  it  a 
medicine  that  was  harmf-'ol,  so  patriotism,  unless  it  is  an 


intelligent  love  may  do  much  damao-e  instead  of  being  a 
helpful  factor  in  group  life.* 

That  oatriotism  as  it  is  taught  today  in  all  too 
many  instances  is  producing  this  damaging  effect  is  obvious. 
In  a  world  which  has  become  so  interdependent  that  the  Viel- 
fare  of  one  section  depends  on  the  welfare  of  another,  it 
seems  the  height  of  stupidity  to  perpetrate  the  idea  that 
love  of  3'our  own  country  means  hate  of  every  other  country, 
yet  that  is  exactly  what  much  of  the  teaching  does,    "'"t  says 
in  effect  "you  must  realize  your  country,-  is  the  best,  the 
most  wonderful  in  all  the  world;  no  other  country  is  to  be 
compared  with  her.    She  must  have  the  best  of  everytliing, 
even  ii  it  must  be  taken  away  from  others  to  give  it  to 
her . " 

The  fact  that  this  old  v'ay  of  teaciiing  is  being 
quest j-oned  is  a  hopeful  sigrn  for  it  will  lead  inevibibly  to 
a  saner,  more  v;orthwiiile  procediare.    Until  this  new  way 
has  become  more  universal,  however,  we  can  not  say  that 
this  quality  wiiich  we  call  patriotism  leaas  to  better  social 
conduct.    If  we  co  Id  change  our  definition  and  insist  that 
patriotism  means  an  intelli:-  eat  love  of  countr  ■ ,  then  the 
entire  picture  is  altered — we  would  h^'Ve  then  a  factor  which 
should  be  a  decided  aid  in  promoting  good  social  conduct. 


I.  V/.  ^owerth,  Teaching  of  Patriotism  Educational  Reviev/, 
May,  1924 


George  A.  Coe,  in  an  art_cle  in  the  Teachers 
College  Record  brings  out  the  fact  that  we  must  not  in  our 
enthusiasm  for  "intelligent"  patriotism,  go  to  the  opposite 
extreme  and  assume  that  loiowledge  alone  will  ins'ore  good  con- 
duct— v.e  need  both  the  intelli,:ent  thinking  and  the  quick 
conscience  that  will  impell  us  to  do  -..hat  we  laiow  is  for  the 
greatest  good  of  everyone  concerned.    He  goes  so  far  as  to 
say  that  "the  aealth  of  popular  governnent  depends  u  on  the 
conscience  as  well  as  the  intelligence  of  citizens,  and  that 
state  schools  exist  for  the  purpose  of  maintaining  the 
ethical  as  ..eil  as  the  intellectual  conditions  of  good 
citizenship^is  a  major  premise  in  practically  all  American 
thinking  upon  education. "-> 

Enlightened  patriotism  and  an  alert  public  con- 
science while  undoubtedly  two  very  important  elements  in 
this  thing  we  are  trying  to  define,  still  do  not  bring  us  to 
grips  with  tliis  problem.    We  need  to  know  much  more  siDecif ic.-'lly 
what  is  expected  of  the  individual. 

.  Snedden,  in  liis  book,  "Civic  Education"  accomplishes 
this  in  a  measure.    In  an  attempt  to  define  rrhat  civic  edu- 
cation is  he  gives  us  a  clue  as  to  v/hat  constitutes  good 
social  and  civic  conduct — for,  us  he  brings  out,  the  goal  of 


■5^  G.  A.  Coe,  Teachers  College  Record,  Volume  XXIII, 
September,  1;;'22,  No.  4. 


civic  education  is  to  produce  Just  this  quality. 

iie  feels  that  this  problem  has  to  do  largely  with 
"political  and  other  large  group  membershios,  including  com- 
pliance v.ith  la?/s  of  s'oate,  municipality,  etc.    These  may  be 
classified  as  follo7;s: 

a.  The  promotion  of  the  appreciations,  ideals,  atti- 
tudes and  minor  amounts  of  imderstanding  necessary  to  procure 
conformity  to  j.eral  and  other  directions  and  restraints, 
such  conf'ormit  -  being  always  measured  in  Lerms  of  specific 
forms  of  social  activity,  such  as  honesty  in  property  rela- 
tionships, obedience  to  traffic  laws,  etc. 

b.  Promotion  of  the  r^inds  and  degrees  of  devotion  to 
country,  city,  town,  and  other  political  groupings  as  col- 
lective social  entities  with  a  view  to  insuring  the  welfare 
of  the  commonwealth  and  the  community.    One  species  of  these 
types  of  devotion  can  well  be  called  patriotism,  but  there 
are  othe:  s  which  can  easily  be  distinguished. 

c.  Training  in  dispositions  and  abilities  to  partici- 
pate actively  in  parties,  volunteer  service,  and  other  ac- 
tivities of  a  positive  nature  designed  to  promote  the  public 
welfare . 

d.  Training  in  dispositions  to  advance  the  state 
directly  by  good  service  in  family,  vocational,  religious, 
and  other  non-political  social  groupings."* 


David  Snedden,  Civic  Ed  ucation,  P.  52 


-15- 

These  seem  to  indicate  specific  ways  in  ipliich  ',ve 
can  accomplish  what  we  liave  previously  said  was  the  basic 
critsrion  for  measuring  good  social  and  civic  conduct:  the 
knowledge  of  ^hat  is  best  to  do  and  the  will  to  do  it. 

Cubberly  also  stresses  forcibly  the  need  of 
knowing  just  what  particiolar  tilings  we  can  give  to  our 
child '-en  as  guides  which  ViiH  aid  them  to  acquire  tliis 
l-cnowledge  of  what  is  "good  conduct."      "The  training  of  the 
youth  of  the  nation  to  have  the  attitudes  and  responses 
that  vre  want  them  to  huve,  must  be  very  largely  by  training 
than  in  a  large  number  of  specific  little  things  which  lead 
in  tlie  direction  in  which  we  -.vcint  thCTi  to  go  and  think.  If 
we  want  to  train  our  young  people  to  express  in  their  lives 
a  high  type  of  national  character,  if  we  vfc;a:t  to  teach  the 
hopes  and  ideals  and  aspirations  and  attitudes  timt  we  would 
liice  our  iiat-on  to  r_ive  expressi-on  to,       must  do  it  by 
careful  teaching  of  those  tilings  to  uiie  children  in  the 
schools  c.nd  b    means  of  the  teacl^ing  of  a  large  number  of 
small  and  yet  Very  specific  things. 

He  suggests  the  following  specific  ways  in  which 
we  might  gain  tiiis  result:    1.    Americanize  our  diverse 
peoples,  v?ho  are  ainon£  us  but  iioTof  us.    2.    T^e  ^lave 
^phasized   .olitical  iiidividufillsra  too  much  by  teaciiing  young 
people  about  their  rights  tind  liberties.    We  need  to  change 
the  pcint  of  emphasis  cjad  t  ach  young  people  instead  abo^^t 


their  duties  aiid  obligations.     3.    rational  self  control — 
which  is  the  mark  of  a  good  and  intelligent  citizen,  should 
be  taught.    4.    loyalty — a  critical  loyalty,  that  sees  the 
wrong  and  loves  the  thing  while  hating  the  Vi?rong.    Stand  for 
the  ideals  beiiind  the  institution,  not  the  institution.* 

Ilin,  in  his  "Nev.'  Russian  i^riraer",  a  book  de- 
signed to  -  ive  school  children  in  J^ussia  a  simple  explanation 
of  the  objectives  of  the  five-year  plan,  and  how  they  can 
help  bring  it  to  pass,  gives  tiiis  Sfune  idea  in  an  even 
greater  degree.    He  describes  to  the  children  certain 
definite  tasks  which  they  can  do  which  constitute  good 
social  conduct;  such  things  as  planting  ten  trees  every  five 
years,  keeping  the  parks  and  playgrounds  free  from  nibbish, 
planting  gardens — all  of  which  suggest  the  idea  of  working  for 
the  rood  of  the  group. 

This  same  idea  has  been  carried  out  in  a  series  of 
charts  and  scales  for  measuring  habits  of  good  citizenship 
which  were  developed  for  use  in  the  Horace  Mann  School  and 
have  since  been  used  vjith  much  success  in  other  schools. 
These  scales  are  based  on  the  iame  principle  as  the  -^yres 
Spelling  list — they  show  the  v/eak  points,  and  so  they  can 
conceixtrate  on  correcting  their  particular  wealoiess.  They 

E.  i'.  (lubberly,  "Some  Larger  ^i-spects  of  the  Problem  of 
Citizenship  Training.    Teacher's  College  Record,  ^ol.  23 
P.  101-108,  March  1922 


work  on  the  theory  that  if  ciiildren  only  knev/  just  what 
specific  qualities  they  were  lacking,  they  could  more  easily 
remedy  the  shortage.    One  chart  includes  one  hundred  and 
eighty  seven  items  and  attempts  "an  analysis  of  conduct  in 
terms  of  the  concrete  and  specific  habits  and  attitudes  T^hich 
saould  ciiaracterize  a  child  mio  is  tailing  part  as  a  good 
citizen  in  iiis  elementar^y-"  school  democracy."    Such  traits  as 
cooperat-on,  initiative,  straightforwardness,  orderliness, 
etc.,  are  included. 

The  implications  of  these  tests  are  that  they 
present  in  miniature  those  desirable  qualities  which  v/e  nave 
suggested  above  and  so  -ive  the  ch^ld  a  right  start  in 
developing  them  in  preparation  for  talcing  his  part  as  an 
adult  member  of  his  group. 

It  was  interesting  to  note  that  these  cliarts  were 
used  as  a  basis  for  Civics  courses  in  the  Junior  ^^igh  School 
the  question  being  raised  as  to  why  these  particular  traits 
should  be  included  as  part  of  the  equipment  of  a  good  citizen 

While  these  various  illustrations  help  to  give  us 
a  more  concrete  picture  of  this  thing  v/e  call  good  conduct, 
there  is  one  very  vital  element,  it  seems,  which  while  it  is 
implied,  is  not  stressed  as  much  as  it  well  might  be.  One 

^hassell,  Oiara  ^  . ,  Upton,  Siegfried  Maia,  and  Chassell, 
Short  Scales  for  iviea  uring  Habits  of  Good  Oi-tizensliip. 
Teacher's  College  Record,  VqI.  25:  P.  52-79    January  1922 


great  essential  in  good  social  and  civic  conduct,  a£  Gambrill 
1:^  expressed  it  is  "a  ccientific  attitude  in  the  field  of 
social  and  political  problems  as  well  as  in  the  realm  of 
nature."    He  feels  that  we  should  seek  to  substitute  for 
pride  of  opinion,  pride  in  keeping  the  mind  open,  willingness 
to  investigate,  to  collect  evidence,  to  weigh  and  to  judge, 
"■'"t  should  seek  to  arouse  and  stiraulatf  curiosity  and  a 
questioning  interest,  instead  of  instilling  conventional 
doctrine  a-nd  discoura.- ing  inquiry,    ^t  should  seek  to  guard 
against  the  impulses  of  instinct  and  emotion,  and  encourage 
rational  thought  and  behavior."  * 

In  other  words  \:e  should  recognise  the  fact  that 
there  is  always  room  for  improvement  and  unless  we  have  a 
sense  of  discontent  with  things  as  they  are,  we  will  never  ad- 
vance beyond  the  p.  int  where  ve  noWa.re.    Changing  conditions 
bring  new  needs  and  unless  we  discard  our  ever-present 
tendency  to  cling  to  ideas  and  institutions  wiiich  hs.ve  lost 
their  usefulness,  we  can  not  be  said  to  be  displaying  the 
more  elemental  characteristics  of  good  civic  and  social 
conduct. 

The  amount  of  illustrations  explaining  just  what 
this  hard  to  define  factor  is  are  almost  as  limitless  as  the 
proverbial  sands  of  ths-  sea,  but  out  of  all  the  rather 


*J.  LI.  GAmbrill,  "Nationalism  and  Civic  Education.  Teachers 
College  Record,  Vol.  23;  P.  109-lEO.    March  1922. 


puzzling,  sometimes  vague,  sometimes  specific,  qualities  which 
it  is  believed  go  to  mai^e  up  this  thing,  there  emerges  tv/o 
underlying  ideas  which  seem  to  be  characteristic  of  all  of 
them:    1.    it  is  that  course  of  action  which  enables  people 
to  live  together  harmoniously  in  a  constantly  enlarging 
group  relationship.    2.    it  is  a  type  of  conduct  which  v/ill 
adapt  itself  to  the  constantly  changing  conditions  of  the 
world  to  the  end  that  a  more  perfect  v/ay  of  living  may  be 
achieved  than  is  nov,'  possible. 

Now  that  we  have  arrived  at  a  more,  if  not  an 
entirely,  satisfactory  "common  ground"  and  understand  our 
terms  more  clearly,  we  can,  in  the  light  of  these  meanings, 
restate  cur  problem  and  make  an  attempt  to  solve  it.  "Is 
there  anything  in  this  sense  of  "co-working  with  '-'od",  which 
is  the  essense  of  tliis  religious  teaching,  which  would  so 
motivate  a  person's  conduct  that  it  vdll  compell  hLm  to  make 
better  social  and  civic  reactions  than  he  is  now  making."  In 
other  words,  "^s  religious  teac  ing  the  most  powerful  dynamic 
to  right  living  together"  that  v/e  can  find? 


BOOK         T  \i  0 


THE  PSYCHOLOGICAL  VIEVtPOINT 


-20- 

Chapter  Five 
What  Psychologists  Say. 

Man  is  incurably  religious  i   how  ol'ten  we  liear 
this  statement.    Has  it  any  psychological  foundation  cr  is 
it  anotner  popular  fancy  that  has  no  bearing-  in  fact?  is 
religion  an  instinctive  thing,  inherent  and  still  vital  to 
man'  nature,  or  is  it  something  acquired  during  the 
civilisine  virocess  which  is  not  now  er&en'oid  for  his 
welfare? 

Many  ])sychologists  now  hold  the  theory  that  there 
are  only  two  or  tliree  instincts  in  human  beings,  and  all 
other  acts,  though  they  seem  to  be  performed  with  no 
thought,  so  that  we  loosely  say  we  do  them  instinctively, 
are  really  eji  outgrowth  of  these  primary  instincts,  caused 
by  vrhnt  is  known  as  the  "conditioned  reflex." 

The  orocess  of  conditioning,  according  to  Freeman, 
is  looked  uoon  by  seme  .  sychologists  and  educators  as  the 
sole  and  sufficient  means  by  which  the  conduct  of  a  child 
may  be  modified  and  directed.-^- 

Briefly  it  raeejis  that  since  a  child  vrill  strive 
to  do  that  v;hich  irives  him  plea.=^ure  and  reject  that  which 
brings  discomfort,  if  v;e  can  link  u.-  nev--  courses  of 
actions  with  wnich  he  is  likely  to  come  into  contact  often, 

Peligion  and  Conduct,  A  Report  of  a  Conference  held  at 
Northwestern  University,  November  15  and  16,  1929,  ?.  28 


with  either  of  those  feelings,  we  can  either  inhibit  or 
promote  them  as  re  will. 

So,  from  the  stand  oint  of  its  etfect  on  conduct, 
it  matters  little  whether  a  thin^-  be  innate  or  not — there 
are  obviously  many  powerful  motives  to  action  that  have 
been  acquired  and  are  as  strong  as  the  instinctive  drives 
to  action. 

The  real  basis  for  this  aspcrtion  th^;  t  man  is  in- 
curably religious  woulc  seem  to  lie  in  the  fact  that  there 
is  something  in  the  conceptions  found  in  religion  that  tend 
to  adjust  man  cetter  to  the  \7orld  in  which  he  finds  himself. 

These  instinctive  reactions  and  conditioned  re- 
flexes do  not  account  for  all  the  responses  a  child  makes — 
these  two  surely  mechanical  things  are  siiff icient  for  the 
lower  animals,  but  they  do  not  provide  satisfactory  ex- 
plajiations  of  the  many  and  varied  reactions  made  by  people 
to  tiieir  environment.    Human  behavior  and  the  structure  of 
the  nervous  system,  both  testify  to  the  important  role  of 
ideas  in  guiding  human  conauct.     It  is  this  factor  that 
lifts  the  desired  satisfactions  out  of  the  merely  physical. 
Though  a  person  tends  to  make  those  responses  vrhich  will 
afford   .h^T-sical  satisfaction,  yet  there  is  l-Jlso  a  satis- 
faction that  is  apparently  more  desirable,  since  they  will 
choose  physical  dissatisfaction  in  order  to  attain  it. 

If  this  be  true,  that  r-ligion  is  ^ne  of  the 


ideas  that  man  has  evolved  as  an  aid  to  adjusting  himself 
to  xiis  environment,  then  v:e  sho'old  be  able  to  count  upon  it 
to  furnish  sufficient  motivation  for  the  type  of  conduct 
we  wish  to  produce — for  social  and  civic  conduct,  as  v/e  have 
implied,  means  more  harmonious  adju&traent  of  everyone  to 
the  Forld  in  which  they  live. 

Have  psychologists  any  evidence  thet  religion 
could  do  such  a  thing?    -"-f  Ur.  i'reeman  be  right  (and  he  has 
amply  substantiated  his  belief)  that  "ideas  are  the  crucial 
factor  in  h-aman  motivation""  then  it  v.'ould  logicaj_ly  follow 
that  our  conduct  will  in  the  end  be  determined  by  our  con- 
ception of  the  universe  in  which  we  find  ourselves. 

Dr.  '■'■'ittle,  spea-ing  at  the  Conference  on 
"Religion  and  Conduct"  held  at  Northv/estern  University,  in 
November,  1929,  sei-.es  upon  this  point  made  by  Dr.  i'Veemen, 
to  show  hov;  this  very  f ..ct  is  the  cause  of  the  influence  that 
religion  has  bad-  -if  .  t  •/'ere  not  for  the  conception  and 
ideas  given  to  us  by  religion  it  would  be  difficult  to 
imagine  more  than  a  few  courageous  Joseph  Conrads  and 
Bertrand  Russels,  who,  in  the  face  of  dispair,  would  hold 
fast  to    hat  they  felt  Vvas  best.  As  Doctor  Tittle  so 

vividly  expresses  it,  "i'ou  begin  with  the  assumption  that  'all 


■'^■Freeman,  Religion  and  Conduct,  E.  53 
^'r  ^/ric  Tittle,     "        "         "  P.  40 


the  labors  cf  the  ares,  ell  the  devotion,  all  the  inspiration, 
all  the  noonday  brighuness  of  hiimaii  genius  are  destined  to 
extinction  in  the  vast  death  of  the  solar  system' j  you  end 
with  the  assumption  that  on  a  'microscopic  dot'  cf  the  solar 
system  'tiny  lum::E  cf  impure  carbon  and  v;ater  of  complicated 
structure,  with  somewhat  unusual  physical  and  chemical 
properties  ,cfl»av.'l  .^bcut  for  a  few  years  until  they  are  dis- 
solved again  in  the  elements  cf  which  they  are  compounded. ' 
And  then  what?    "^n  the  assumption  that  man  is  a  spiritual 
being  there  is  nothing  in  the  way  of  fine  conduct  which 
you  may  not  reasonably  expect  of  him.    But  v/hat  may  j'-ou 
reasonably  exDect  of  him  on  the  assumption  that  he  is 
nothing  more  than  a  'tiny  lump  of  impure  carbon  and  water'?" 
"Persuade  us  that  we  are  sometiiing,"  he  goes  on  to  say,  "and 
we  will  undertake  to  do  soniethinp  v.'orthwhile  in  the  world," 
He  questions  if  anytliir.g  less  radical  and  creative  than 
religious  faith  will  prove  adequate  to  effect  those  changes 
in  conduct  which  simply  must  be  brought  about  if  ever  v«e 
are  to  I'^ave  a  better  world 

Cannot  these  SE-me  results  be  attained  through 
moral  or  ethical  teacciings,  many  ask?    There  is  little 
evidence  to  show  tijfit  for  the  great  mass  of  the  people 


^  Religion  and  Conduct,    ?.  40 


-24- 

Tnls  would  v.ori:.         have  c  id  that  Matthew  Arnold  defined 
religion  as  "morality  -Lit  up  by  emotion" — this  may  be  the 
reason  tiiat  it  succeeds  vfhere  other  tilings  fail,  since,  as 
Dr.  Freeman  pcints  out,  idear  coupled  with  emotions  form 
tv.c  cf  the  raost  powerful  driving  forces  v:e  laiovv  of. 

^oe  feels  as  does  ^'reeman,  that  religion,  rightly 
conceived,  acts  as  a  tremendous  dynamic  to  make  men  act  more 
socially  minded.    One  reason.  Freeman  feels,  tht.t  so  much 
anti-social  condioct  is  present  today,  thour;h  religion  is 
active  is  that  the  old  theological  and  doctrinal  inter- 
pretations have  been  rf  tained  vrhen  they  v:ere  no  longer  of 
any  value  and  hence  have  hindered  rather  than  hel{)ed  in 
changing  conduct.    People  have  been  so  busy  vvith  their 
petty  theolorical  arguements  that  they  htive  lost  sirht  of 
the  compelling  pov/^:r  of  the  great  religious  ideal  of  a 
"s'-.iritual  man  with  a  spiritual  destiny." 

Eliv;ood  affirms  that  from  the  standpoint  of  a 
social  psychologist,  "one  of  the  greatest  social  needs  of 
the  present  is  a  religion  adapted  to  the  requirements  of 
our  modern  life  and  in  harmony  v;ith  modern  science."'""  He 
mentions  a  conversation  with  G.  Lawes  ^ickerson,  in  which 
the  latter  echoed  his  feeling  that  the  world  needs  more 
religion — of  the  right  sort.     "Of  religion  of  a  certain  sort 
there  is  plenty  but  not  enough  of  the  right  sort",  is  his 
conviction.    His  implication  v/as  that,  y.ist  as  Freecan 
pointed  out,  people  need  to  pay  more  attention  to  religion 


^C.  A.  E^lwood,    Introduction  to  Social  x^svcholopv  P 


275 


and  lees  to  theological  abstractions. 

Ty70  emenent  British  sociologists,  -^llvfood  tells 
us,  iiave  voiced  the  Sojne  feeling  as  he  expressed,  in  saving 
"V,e  are  compelled  to  the  admission  (one  hard  for  the  student, 
the  r-an  of  yure  or  applied  science)  tliat  the  essential  prob- 
lem of  life  is  r;ot  material  but  psychxiai.    In  short  life 
needs  to  be  enpsychic,  or  in  other  words,  religious. 

Probably  one  of  the  most  interesting  periods  to 
psychologists  interested  in  the  problem  of  "adjustment"  is 
the  time  of  adolescence,  for^t  is  then  ohat  the  child  has 
to  make  ids  great  adjusunents — Dhe  time  when  he  vfill  be 
formulating  his  oxm  ideas  and  interpretations  of  liis  ex- 
t)eriences,  which  vdll  inevitab:.y  influence  liis  res  cnses  to 
a  great  degree,    "ave  psychologists  been  t.ble  to  tine,  cut 
whether  or  not  religion  played  any  part  in  this  period  in 
helping  children  raalre  the  meny  and  difficult  adjustments 
necess&ry? 

Fov/ler  ^.  Broo:':s  of  John  HopKins  University,  dis- 
cussing the  psychology  of  adolescence,  brings  out  the  fact 
that  up  to  this  period  (i.e.  adolescence^  tiie  ciiild  is  more 
ai^t  to  accept  unquestionably  whatever  religioLis  beliefs  are 
told    im,  but  at  this  time,  in  common  v.dth  all  the  other 
tilings  he  has  been  taught,  his  religious  beliefs  undergo 


C.  A.  Ellwood  "The  Reconstruction  of  Religion"    Pa.  VII 


careful  scrutiny.    He  tends  tc  test  tir-ongs  by  his  experiences 
they  are  real  to  liim  and  he  feels  confident  of  them;  there- 
fore if  -.ny  of  ids  teach  nj'S  have  been  formal  and  doctrinal 
and  do  net  square  up  with  hxs  experiences  there  is  bouna  to 
be  a  conflict  between  them.    He  cannot  discard  Ms  ex- 
periences for  he  l-:nov:s  them  to  be  £are  and  so  he  finds  him- 
self in  a  mcst  p^rpxexing  situation.    It  is  unfortunate 
that  religion  has  too  often  lost  its  appeal  and  value  to  a 
child  at  this  time  because  it  v='as  pres.nted  in  a  "theological 
rather  than  a  tr  ly  religious  way. 

It  is  at  this  period  that  the  elements  of  worship 
seem  to  me-ke  their  strongest  appeal  and,  if  wisely  guided, 
have  great  influence  in  shaping  the  child's  conduct.  The 
emotional  life  developes  so  strongly  at  this  oeriod  that 
it  seems  to  lir.d  in  religion  a  great  appeal;  i-clig-^on  at 
this  time  seems  to  acquire  a  more  personal  tinge. 

The  effect  of  religion  on  the  adolescent  boy  or 
girl  is  well  summed  up  by  Brooks'  comment:     "^^nder  favorable 
conditions,  religion  occupies  a  very  important  place  in  the 
life  of  the  maturing  boy  or  girl.    It  satisfies  liis  groping 
for  a  fundamental,  s\Tithesi?ed  understanding  of  the  whole 
reaLT.  of  experie|ice.    ■'•t  g:.ves  him  a  sense  of  values,  a  sense 
of  personal  relations liips  and  obiigat-ons.    It  facilitates 

the  formation  of  high  ideals  of  unselfish  service,  "''t 

 1  — .  

^-  F.  D.  Brooks,  The  Psychology  of  -n-dolesceuf  e    Giaapter  XI 


-27- 

gives  him  help  in  attaining  that  self -control  and  self- 
discipline  V' nich  characterise  strong  personality.    It  reen- 
forces  hiqfnoral  character.    It  aids  him  m  resolving  many 
conflicts  of  impulses  and  desires,  and  thus  assists  him  in 
attaining  sound  mental  health.    Praise,  prayer,  and  other 
elements  of  v/orsiiip  may  enrich  and  deepen  his  life,  and  add 
miicli  to  its  wholesomeness  and  happiness.    Religion  in 
reality  involves  personal  devotion  to  a  Supreme  Being,  and 
can  provide  a  unifying  force  for  all  that  is  highest  and 
best  in  the  youth's  nature. 

It  is  not  alone  in  adolescence  that  religion, 
according  to  psychologists,  can  play  an  important  part,  but 
it  is  also  a  vital  factor  in  adulthood. 

Probably  one  reagon  v/hy  this  need  is  so  felt  today 
is  because  of  the  fact  that  v/e  have  advanced  at  such  a 
tremendously  rapid  rate  scientifically,  thiit  we  are  rath  r 
bewildered  by  the  mass  of  inventions  that  surround  us — it 
has  put  our  world  out  of  joint  as  it  v/ere  and  we  have  not 
yet  been  able  to  adjust  our  thiriking  to  the  new  situation. 
During  the  latter  part  of  the  nineteenth  century  science  took 
such  tremendous  strides,  that  oeople  in  their  admiration  al- 
most T^/orsiiip  ed  it — it  sat  in  the  saddle,  so  to  speak  and 
everything  else  had  to  give  v/ay  to  it. 


f.  D.  Brooks,  Thg^ Psychology  of  ^--dolescence    ^  .  341-34<; 


-28- 

Tcday  many  educators  are  questioning  the  wisdom  of  this  •  r.o 
suggesting  tliat  it  would  be  well  if  science  would  call  a  halt 
so  that  the  rest  of  our  living  mif  ht  "catch  up"  as  it  vfere, 
with  its  enormous  advance.    One  very  baa  result  of  tliis  lack  of 
adjustment  is  that  it  does  not  make  for  harmonious  living —  we 
seem  to  be  so  constituted  that  in  order  to  fiincticn  amootlily  we 
need  a  sense  of  i^ity  and  completeness  in  our  life,  or  we  feel 
at  a  loss.    This  need  has  been  well  expressed  by  Frederick 
Harrison  when  he  wrote  "Y^e  have  a  rich  harvest  of  science,  a 
profusion  of  material  facilities,  a  vast  collection  of  the 
ideas  and  products  of  past  ages  ...  we  need  only  harmon, 
and  union;  v.e  need  only  to  group  into  a  v/hole  these  pov/ers  and 
gifts;  the  task  before  us  is  to  discover  some  complete  and 
balanced  system  of  life,  some  common  basis  of  belief;  some 
object  for  the  imperishable  relig-ous  instii-cts  and  aspirations 
of  man^cind;  some  faith  to  bind  the  existance  of  man  to  the 
vast  universe  arouna  him;  some  common  social  bond  for  thought 
action  and  feeling. 

It  is  just  such  a  unifying  force  \/nich  religion 
contributfs ,  as  Brooks  has  suggested,  and  because  of  this 
unique  power  it  is  a  factor  whose  importance  at  this  particular 
time  is  almost  incalculable. 


-^"Frederic  ^arrison,  The  lYieaning  of  History,  i:'.  75 


Psychology  then,  seems  to  offer  abundant  evidence 
that  in  religious  teaching,  vre  have  a  tremendous  motivating 
power,  which,  rightly  directed,  can  do  much  to  insure  ths.t 
social  and  civic  conduct  which  v?e  need  so  badly. 

The  fact  that  it  has  failed  so  often  due  to  lack 
of  appreciation  of  its  real  significance,  and  lack  of  under- 
standing of  hov;  to  make  use  of  it,  does  not  minimize  the  tre- 
mendous help  which,  rightly  utilized,  it  may  be  to  us. 


BOOK  THREa 


SURVEYS  OF  AGENCIES  GIVING  RELIGIOUS  TEACHING. 


-50- 
Chapter  Six 
Purpose  of  the  Survey 

That  in  religious  teaching  as  defined  by  the 
psychologists  there  is  tremendous  motivating  pcv/er  for  con- 
trolling conduct,  is  evident,  yet,  though  this  be  time,  our 
problem  is  not  entirely  solved.    Unless  this  type  of  religious 
teacliing  ceji  be  translated  into  an  actuality  by  being  embodied 
in  a  curriculum,  we  have  gone  only  i^axt  way  along  the  road. 
To  have  a  theory,  however  sound,  that  a  certain  conception  will 
bring  desired  results,  is  not  enough,  for  unless  v/e  taow  v/hat 
means  to  use  to  get  this  idea  across,  it  can  not  function. 

Are  there  such  means  as  will  serve  to  reveal  the 
concept  that  "man  is  a  spiritual  being  with  a  spiritual 
destiny"?    It  v/oald  seem  then,  as  if  our  next  step  would  be  to 
examine  the  teachings  of  the  agencies  who  are  professedly 
giving  relVious  teaching  and  see  if  in  tne  programs  they  offer 
there  is  anything  that  would  give  this  concept,  or  any  other 
concept  that  has  proved  compelling  in  regulating  conduct. 


-51- 


Chapter  Seven 
The  Church 

V*e  look  first  to  the  church  as  tne  nlace  for 
children  to  receive  religious  teaciiings,  anu  it  ifc  entirely 
natural  thct  we  should  do  so,  for  for  centuries  the  church  has 
occupied  tliis  role,    '^hvt  it  has  been  avvare  of  the  need  of  this 
teaching,  if  it  \70uld  carry  on  its  work  is  evident.    -H-n  in- 
teresting illustration  of  this  is  seen  in  the  tablet  to  be 
seen  on  the  gateposts  of  one  of  tlie  Harvard  University 
buildings,  which  states  that  the  University  vras  founded  in 
order  to  insure  to  the  churches  an  educated  ministry,  with- 
out wiJ-ch  they  could  not  ho  e  to  endure. 

It  seems  a  curious  paradox  that,  realizing  how 
great  the  need  of  teaching-  is,  the  church  has  been  so  slow  to 
sponsor  forcefully  an  ef i  cc '.ive  teacliing  program  for  all  its 
followers.    She  has  in  nost  cases,  insisted  on  a  well  trained 
ministry,  and  her  requirements  for  that  phase  of  her  vork 
have  been  rigid,  but  she  has  allowed  one  of  the  most  vital 
phases  of  her  task  to  be  carried  on  by  lay  peop-Le,  often  with 
no  training  whatsoever,  and  whose  on-.y  qualif icetion  for  tiiis 
supreme  task  was  a  desire  to  pass  on  to  the  children  a  love 
for  the  cborch — an  essential  qualification  to  be  sure,  but 
certairJ.y  pitifully  inadequate. 

However,  of  late  years,  the  church  seems  to  be 


-52- 

wai'.ing  to  the  need  of  a  great  and  fundsjnental  change  in  her 
former  attitude;  religious  education  is  becoming  the  dcminent 
thing  in  her  thoughte  and  she  is  planning  a  program  that  is 
becoming  more  worthwhile  and  effective. 

Let  us  examine  recent  activities  in  this  field 
and  see  if  we  can  find  there  any  indication  that  the 
teacriing  that  is  being  carried  on  under  her  direction  contains 
those  elements  which  will  lead  to  better  conduct. 

This  is  not  as  simple  a  matter  as  first  thought 
might  indicate,  for  in  the  past  generation,  as  has  been 
pointed  out,  the  church  has  increased  greatly  her  activities. 
Where  formerly  the  work  was  limited  to  an  hour  of  instruction 
on  Simday,  when  the  so-called  "Sunday  School"  or  "Bible 
School"  met,  it  nov/  ii.cludes  not  only  the    '^•onday  Church 
School"  but  weekday  schools  of  religion j  daily  vacation 
schools;  summer  camps  and  conferences;  all  working  toward  the 
^oal  of  developing,  tlirough  religious  teaching,  better 
attitudes . 

In  the  majority  of  the  churches,  however, • we 
would  find  that  the  only  organized  work  was  carried  on  tiirough 
the  Sunday  Church  School,  and  so  an  ejialysis  of  the  material 
taken  up  here  wo  O-d  give  us  a  fairly  reliable  i-  dication  cf 
the  scope  of  the  religious  teacli:-r.g  received. 


-55- 


?ve,  as  teachers,  ere  inclined  to  be  a  little 
sceptical  aoout  curricula  and  courses  of  study;  too  often  have 
we  seen  what  looked  to  be  a  fascinating  and  worthwhile  bit  of 
material  in  the  form  of  a  curriculum,  which,  v/hen  carried  into 
the  schoolroom  did  not  function  any  more  adequately  than  the 
one  upon  which  it  v/as  supposed  to  be  an  improvement.    So  v.-e 
would  not  feel  that  an  examination  of  curricula  would  be  in 
any  sense  a  final  basis  on  which  to  pass  judgment  of  the  value 
of  the  subsequent  teacliing,  but  nevertheless  it  would  in- 
dicate whether  there  v. as  8jny  real  religious  teaching  possible, 
if  orily  in  a  negative  way — that  is  if  there  was  nothing  in  the 
cirriculum  except  formal,  dogmatic,  catachismic,  material,  we 
would  not  expect  it  to  have  much  effect  on  the  child,  in  the 
way  of  improved  responses. 

For  tiiis  examination  I  have  selected  the  curricula 
used  by  the  Jevrish,  Catholic,  Episcopalian,  Methodist  and 
Unitarian  churches,  as  they  represent  five  distinct  types  of 
religious  thinking,  with  some  one  of  which  the  great  majority 
of  our  peop-.e  are  in  sympathy. 

This  does  not  mean,  of  course,  that  the  majority 
of  our  people  are  actively  interested  in  one  cf  the  tjnpes — on 
the  contrary  it  is  a  sad  cormneiitarj'-  on  the  effectiveness  of 
these  teachings  that  f.even  cut  of  ten  voimF  people,  under 
twenty-five  years  of  age  are  not  t  uched  in  any  way  by  the 


/ 


-54- 

teach  ngs  cf  any  church."^ 

Ls  a  ros^"!"*"        their  st--'dy  '  f  chi -.-i  needs,  '^'".^ 
Jewish  C'-.a-  tauqua  Society  has    "itlined  the  following  c^^r- 
riculom  for  the  religious  education  of  J  elvish  children.-?-''^ 

Curricvlum  of  Religious  Education  f '^r  Jervish 
Children;    Prlnisr:/  through  Senior  An:e 

Primary:    Stories  of  Creation  and  Early  history — 
thrci^gh  Abraham 

Stories,  of  Jacob  and  Jose'^h,  Moses;  Esther 
;rayers,  psalms  s  d  comraanduients  taught 

Intermediale:     ^essf"'ns  in  Biblical  Hist'r>' — from 
looses  through  entrance  to  Pr^^'inised 
Land 

From  De'  orah  through  oolomon 

Junior:     The  Hebrew  Prophets 

Senior:     The  oe'M.sh  Religion 

Jewish  Ethics  (home  duties,  school,  com 
munal  duties,  religious  duties) 

Curricula  for  Roman  Catholic  Church  Sch'-ols 

The  educatio-^.el  program  of  the  Roman  Catholic 
Church  includes  two  series  "f  readers,  and  a  series  cf 
catechisms,  adapted  far  Primary  through  Senior  age  groups, 
rbe  one  called  "Catholic  Edncation  Spries"  is  used  primarily 
in  the  Sunday  Church  school,  and  the  "Standard  Catholic 
Readers  by  Grades"  in  the  daily  parochial  sch  ol. 

.  f  .  Atheern,  Characjter  Building  In  a  Democracy,  -  .  ?G 
Henry  Berkowitz,    The  New  Education  in  Religion 


-35- 


Catholic  Education  Series^ 

First  Book:    Ne'.;  lestament  stories,  designed  to  shew 
the  dependence  of  the  child  on  God's 
loving  care 

Second  Book:  Aims  t-'  show  thr  ough  examples  from  Bible 
and  church  history  thct  there  is  an  all- 
prevading"  law       God,  which  we  shonJd 
ob^y . 

Third  Book:    Devoted  wholly  to  the  \7ork  of  Redemption 
as  foreshadowed  in  the  Old  Testament  and 
embodied  in  the  New.    Aims  to  show  child 
that  solvation  ma.;^-  be  f  und  through 
obedience  to  God  and  legitimately  con- 
stituted authority.    A  third  reader  of 
h^rn  stories  is  used  with  it. 

Fourth  Boo.  :  Cea^E  with  the  Mass  and  its  surroundings 
for  "it  is  here  thct  the  child  T'/ill  find 
the  great  central  source  nf  grace  which 
will  enable  him  to  live  -/orthily  in  the 
kin.^dom  of  God  on  earth.    In  the  fourth 
reader  7/hich  accompanies  it  the  child 
v;ill  learn  some  of  the  great  work  whir' 
the  church  has  acc^n^  lished  amo'^<^  r:^on 

"The  Standard  Catholic  Ref^dor  by  Grades"  is  an 
"eight  book  series"  of  readers  for  the  first  to  the  eis'hth 
grades.    Stori-^s  svch  as  -  cu  would  find  in  man7/'  school 
readers  are  included,  and  there  are  many  stories  about 
saints  and  martyrs  of  the  Christian  Church  and  illustra- 
tions of  greet  paintings  of  Biblic?  1  scenes. 

The  Department  of  Religious  Education  -'f  the 
National  Council  of  the  i'rot^sta'^t  E^iscoral  Church  has 


wor^:ed  'ut  a  program  of  roligious  educsticn  f  r  their 


chxirch  schools,  called  the  "Christian  i^urture  Series." 
Christian  ^'urture  Series 


Kindergarten:  Age 

a.  The  Fatherhood  of  God  4 

b.  Our  Father's  Gifts  5 


First  Primaiy: 

1.  Trust  in  God  (creed  and  6 
Lord's  Prayer; 

2.  Obeaience  to  God  7 
( commandments ) 

Second  Frimai^' : 

3.  God  with  Man — Sacraments  8 

4.  God's  Great  Fainil^' — 

The  Church's  Mission  9 


Grammar: 

5.  The  Christian  Seasons  10 

6.  Churc'.;  Worship  and 

ilembersiiip  il 


Junior  High: 

7.    The  Life  of  Our  Lord  12 

6.    The  Long  Life  of  the  Ch  urch  15 

9.    Our  Churc'n  and  **jr  Mission  14 


Senior  High: 

(Any  of  tr.e  following  texts  regardless 
of  order  are  suitable  for  the  high 
school  age) 

Winning  the  Rorid  for  Christ 

Our  Bible 

The  Bible  in  Outline 

The  Work  of  the  Holy  Spirit  in  t  le  Church 

T'le  Creed  and  Christian  Conviction 

The  Church  and  the  Co-muunity 

Jesus:    Then  and  Now    (in  preparation) 

The  uiethodist  Church,  ti-rough  its  Department 


-57- 


of  Helitjioas  Education  works  in  close  coop;;ratLon  v/ith  the 
International  Council  of  Religious  Education,  an  organization 
which  serves  as  a  cooperating  force  for  most  of  the 
Protestant  denominations,  aiming  to  provide  through  joint 
effort,  a  more  effective  prograa  of  religious  education  for 
all  churches.    The  vrork  of  this  organization  will  be  dis- 
cussed in  detail  later.    The  following  series,  therefore, 
is  not  limited  to  the  deriominational  use  ox  the  idethodist 
church  schools. 

GUiiDSD  liNTSrUUTIOKAL  SERIES 

Beginners  ^4  and  5  years  of  age) 

The  Little  Child  and  t      ^eavenly  Father 

Primary : 

Age:    6:  God's  Friendly  7/orld 

7:  Wor^iing  with  the  Heavenly  Father 

3;  Learning  to  -^ive  as  God's  Children 

Junior: 

9:  At  V»ork  in  God's  'r.'orld 

10:  iiero  Stories  aiid  Being  Heroic 

11:  Jesus  and  ills  Helpers 

Intermediate: 

12:    Religion  in  Ev^ryda^  ^Ife  UVhat  is  good 

Sportsmanship, ) 
13:    The  *^aJr;ing  of  a  Better  Viorld 
14:    T  :e  -"ife  and  Teachings  of  <jesus 

Senior:     (15  to  18  years;  any  order; 

Chrintia.1  Leaders — Practicing  Christian 

Democracy 
Youth  and  Claris tian  Living 
Problems  caid  Principles  of  Social  Living 


-33- 


The  Unitarian  denomination,  through  its 
denominational  press,  The  Beacon  -^ress,  has  issued  a 
most  interesting  course  of  stuc^,  icuovrn  as  the  "Beacon 
Course  in  Religious  Education." 

The  Beacon  Coarse  in  Religious  Education 
Beginners: 

Age  4:    The  ■L<ittle  Child  in  Sunday  School 
5:    A  Friendly  V.'orld 

Primary ; 

6:    First  Book  of  Religion 

7:    Living  Together 

8:    Children  of  the  Father 

Junior: 

9:    ^od's  Wonder  'iVorld 
10;    The  Bible  ana  Bible  Country 
11:    Heroic  Lives 

Intermediate* 

12:    From  Lesert  to  Teraple 

13:    The  Stor;^^  of  Jesus 

14:    Peter,  Pa^ii,  and  Their  Friends 


Senior: 

15:    Our  Part  in  the  World 

16:    Taii^s  to  -^oung  People  on  Etaics 

advanced:     (eighteen  years  a^id  older j 

Tlie  Unv/rougat  ■'-ron:    An  -introduction  to 

Religion 
The  Story  of  t  e  I'lew  Testament 
A  Stud^'  of  the  Christian  Sects 
The  Origin  and  Character  of  the  Bible 
Evolut-on  and  Religion 

It  is,  of  course,  impossible  to  come  to  any 


conclusion  as  to  the  value  of  a  curriculum  from  merely 


-59- 


reading  the  naxaes  of  the  various  co-.rses  of  stady  which  it  i 
includes,  but  in  many  of  the  foregoing  cases  tne  titles  are 
sufficiently  discriptive  of  the  luaterial  thi^  ta^^e  up  to  be 
a  fairly  good  index  of  what  tlie  courses  are  ±ike.  Hov/ever, 
further  investigation  is  necessary  to  fina  out  iuore  accurate- 
ly just  what  values  they  contain. 

Upon  furtlier  examining  this  material  we  find  thi^t 
they  ail  start  with  the  same  theme — "tne  ?/oria  is  an  ex- 
pression of  God's  love."    The.  cliild  is  to  think  of  liim  as  a 
loving  Father.    From  t.Ss  point  they  v!xry ,  altaough  t-.ey 
have  many  elements  in  coiranon,  aome  curricula  seem  to  stress 
one  factor  more  than  another.    The  dominent  note  of  the 
Jewish  curriculum  seems  to  be  a  thorough  Jtoiowledge  of  t.ie 
Biblej  the  Ca-.holic  and  Episc^)pal  ones,  an  explanation  and 
interpretation  of  the  church  history,  the  meaning  of  the 
service  axid  the  church  calanaar;    the  International  Graaed 
anci  Beacon  Curricula  sound  constantly  the  note  of  working 
with  God  to  maice  a  be  ter  ftorld,  dwellingjiiiore  on  modern 
social  problems  than  un  history. 

The  Bible  is  unquestionably  the   ,orid' s  supreme 
textbook  for  religious  thinking  and  living,  and  more  than  jinv 
otner  one  book,  contains  inspira:.ion-il  matei-ial  v,'hich  will 
motivate  the  knowledge  it  conveys;  the  long  history  of  the 
church  contains  priceless  lessons  of  neroism  aiia  devotion 


-40- 

to  the  ideals    h^-ch  woold  make  a  child  appreciate  raore 
the  value  of  tae  church  of  today;  the  challenge  of  woriciag 
with  God  in  solving  the  probleias  of  today  so  tiiat  re  may 
have  a  better  i7orld,  has  an  ap  :eal  "hose  strength  ve  can 
not  overestLnate;  these  three  o;itstandi::g  emphases  in  the 
above  curricula  would,  therefore,  lead  to  the  conclusion  that 
as  far  as  subject  uatte    went,   :he  church  as  a  v/hole  has 
struck  the  right  things. 

It  is  questionable,  he -ever,  whetner  tnese  three 
are  not  essential  together,  that  separately  and  alone, 
none  of  them  could  be  sufficiently  compelling  to  res.ilt  in 
the  type  of  conduct  v/e  wish,    Y/ould  it  not  be  ideal  if  these 
coula  be  so  combined  .^n  each  curricxilum  that  the  joxnt  pov?er 
of  them  all  co  la  be  fally  realized.    However,  even  as  they 
stand  they  are  factors  strong  enough  to  make  us  feel  en- 
couraged . 

But,  even  if  Y;e  find  that  the  church  has  apparent- 
ly found  out  the  secret  of  w'.at  tilings  to  incorporate  -Lnto 
its  teacings  in  order  to  mal.e  them  bear  fruit  in  right  livi^.g, 
yet  even  then  ive  can  not  be  sure  that  she  is  asing  this 
knowledge  aright.    How,  then,  is  she  using  this  material? 

As  has  been  pointed  out,  the  Sunday  church  school 
is  the  chief  agent  for  carrying  out  these  teachings.  In 
too  many  of  our  churches  the  values  found  in  the  curricuxa 
above  are  lost  because  there  is  no  adequate  means  of  getting 
them  across  to  the  children,    it  is  difficult  to  adapt  some 
of  the  older  church  buildiiigs,  designed  chiefly  for  the 
church  service,  so  that  it  can  accommodate  a  well  org^rdzed 


-41- 

school;  there  is  little  monefy  for  equipment  and  supplies; 
there  is  a  lack  of  trained  teachers  who  understand  the  child 
and  know  how  to  present  the  material  to  him;  there  is  so  little 
time — one  short   .our  on  Sunday  is  the  average  period;  and 
above  ail  there  is  so  little  cooperation  on  the  part  of  the 
houe,  so  that  the  child  is  irregular  in  attendance  and  in- 
different to  preparation  of  the  Y^ork.    One  writer  has  well 
faced  the  situation  in  saying: 

"It  takes  not  less  than  three  recitation  periods 
a  week  for  a  trained  teacher,  v/ho  can  compel  regular 
attendance  and  outside  study,  to  teach  iiistory,  iitejature, 
mathematics,  or  any  of  the  secular  subjects  of  like  diffi- 
culty.   The  untrained  Church  School  teacher  has  thirty 
minutes,  once  a  weeK,  v»d.th  students  irregular  in  attendance 
who  liave  not  stadied  the  lesson,  to  teach  religion — a  subject 
vastly  more  difficult  tmrn  any  sec  alar  subject,    -i-t  is  a 
hopeless  task  I '  No  v/oader  th...t  the  graduates  of  our  Sunday 
Schools,  after  fif :ee;i  years  of  attendance,  know  so  little 
about  the  Bible,    ^^o  wonder  that,  of  ever;^^  four  children 
in  the  Sunday  Schools  of  America  at  twelve  years  of  age,  three 
will  have  left  both  the  Sunday  School  and  the  Church  forever, 
by  their  eighteenth  year."  ^ 

But,  while  t  .is  situation  is,  unfortunately,  too 


--■C.  C.  i.eith.  The  Teaching  idinistry  of  ti.e  Church,  Page  12 


I 


-42- 

trae  in  many,  probably  the  maTj'it^.  of  the  churc  .es,  yet  in 
many  others  ao  we  find  a  much  more  encouraging  situation, 
if  it  be  true  as  ^"lolmes  tells  us  that  "it  matters  not  so  muc  h 
where  we  stand  as  the  direction  in  which  we  aremoving",  then 
tne  outlook  for  religious  teaching  is  not  as  black  as  it 
would  seem,  for  more  and  more  are  churches  being  built  with 
the  idea  of  providing  adeoiuate  facilities  for  the  church 

school;  more  and  more  is  tx'ained  leadership  being  secured, 
and  parents  are  becoming  aware  of  these  improvements  axid  are 
cooperating  be  ter. 

in  the  Janueiry,  1931,  number  of  the  "■'•nternational 
Journal  of  Religious  Education"  there  is  an  in;.eresting 
article  dealing  wita  just  such  a  neyj  type  of  church — t'le 
Riverside  Church  of  New  York  City,  which  is  designed  so  that 
t-.e  twenty -one  sloiy  tov.er  houses  the  church  school.  Eveiy 
facility  that  one  finds  in  a  well  equipped  educational 
plant  you  will  find  here.    Provision  is  laade  for  classes 
from  i^inderg^rten  through  ad:lt  age  groups.    Wot  only  is 
their  equipment  a  vasL  improveiuent.,  but  more  time  is  found 
for  teaching  workj  for  example,  the  ^kindergarten  meets  from 
nine  thirty  'antil  twelve  thirty  Sunday  morning.^ 

But  before  the  church  began  to  ..ave  tnese  im- 
provements in  the  Siinday  Church  School  many  leaders 
realized  the  necessity  of  having  more  tj.me  for  religious  tea.ching 


c 


-43- 


if  they  ever  v;ere  to  get  anywhere  vdth  their  program.  As 
far  back  as  1367  the  "vacation  school"  idea  was  started  in 
Boston.    It  was  designed  first  to  take  children  in  the  crowded 
sections  of  the  city  off  the  streets  arid  give  them  something 
to  do  during  the  p;^blic  school  summer  vacation. 

About  fourteen  years  ago,  in  Urbana,  Illinois, 
the  American  Institute  of  Religious  Education  was  organized 
to  spread  further  the  work  of  schools  of  this  type  and  to 
try  to  'ave  iiiore  real  teac  dng  ^iccomplished  in  them.  Schools 
sponsored  by  this  Institute  spread  rapialy  tiiToughout  the 
state.    They  ran  from  two  to  six  weeKS  ana  were  carried  on 
in  the  same  v.'ay  as  public  schools,  v^ith  trained  teachers, 
and  differed  only  in  the  content  of  courses.    They  offered 
courses  in  Biblical  iiistory,  geograpl'jy,  hymnoloe;^,  etc. 
Children  came  to  them  in  large  numbers  and,  of  coarse, 
learned  more  in  the  few  weeks  than  they  could  learn  in  the 
average  church  school  during  the  Vvhole  vi'inter.    It  also  .:Lad 
the  good  result  of  gj.ving  the  cidld  a  liiora  serious  attitude 
toward  .J.s  church  school,  and  tended  to  raise  t-ne  stanaard 
of  teaching  in  it. 

However,  many  parents  object  to  their  children 
giving  up  their  summer  vacai.ions  ^aa  so  another  ty^e  of 
school  is  now  being  formed,  particularly  in  the  middle 
western  states — ..he  v.eekday  school  of  religion. 


-44- 

There  are  various  waj'S  in  which  this  plaii  is 
carried  out.    '-'ne,  imown  as  t -e  "Gary  i'lan",  originated  in 
Gary,  Indiana.    Because  of  a  rather  unusual  situation  in  the 
jjubj-ic  schools  it  was  ^lossible  for  the  churches  to  have 
part  of  the  school  aay  of  the  child.    The  school  sched,ile 
leaves  the  children  v.-ith  one  or  iuore  free  periods  during 
the  day  when  he  does  not  .lave  to  be  at  school  but  can  return 
to  his  lome  if  he  wishes,    ixs  different  groups  have  their 
free  periods  r.t  diff  .rent  l^ours,  ihe  churc  -es  have  worked 
out  a  program  so  that  children  may  come  to  classes  during 
these  periods  each  day.    Thus  one  teacher,  can  tai<.e  care  of 
several  different  groups  at  aifferent  times  ..ud  so  they  iiave 
a  full  time  teacher,  teac.ung  just  as  the  teacher  does  in 
the  pubxic  schools.    The  cliilaren,  of  course,  get  lauch  more 
out  of  it  aiid  the  parents  feel  it  is  iaore  v'/orthwaile,  so 
they  cooperate  better,  insuring  a  m.,re  regular  attendance. 

Perhaps  the  beot  arrangement  of    his  sort  v/as  to 
be  found  in  tne  religious  education  program  in  ivialden, 
Massachusetts,  which  vvas  a  coimaunity  scuool  of  religion 
sponsored  "by  a  community   coLuaittee  made  up  oi  represexititive 
from  all  tue  Protestant  C-iurCiies  in  i«iaj.den  who  l/ere  v/ixling 
to  coope-ate  to  carry  11  on.    The  details  of  tnis  plan  ?all 
be  aiscussed  in  a  later  chapter  Y;ith  reference  to  the 
relation       t.^e  public  school  to  this  iiev/  movement. 


c 


-45- 


The  '^ewish  church  has  for  a  long  time  made  use  of 
the  week  day  school  iuea.    They  have  developed  a  system  of 
religious  education  which  is  just  as    ell  administered  as  is 
the  public  school  ^stem — with  the  exce  .tion  that  the  at- 
tendance is  not  compulsory''  it  is  very  similar.    There  are 
regular  courses  of  study  under  tr:iined  teac.iers  in  v.e.ul 
equipped  class  rooms,  and  the  children  come  after  school 
hoars  as  v/ell  as  on  their  Sabbeth. 

-i-t  is  not  strange  taat  the  •'ewish  people  shouxd  be 
the  ones  to  t:jie  care  .nost  carefully  of  this  part  of  their 
religious  life,  f.^r  the  "Jewish  race  iias  ever  .lad  a  peculiar 
genius  for  religious  teac  iiig,  jast  as  the  Romans  have  given 
law  aiid  t":-e  Cireeks  philoso;_^hy ,  to  the  world,  so  nas  the 
Jevd-sh  race  contributed  the  great  religious  and  spiritual 
leaders  to  mankind.    They  liave  guarded  jealously  their  re- 
ligious heritage  ar.a  passed  it  on  to  their  children  through 
the  medium  jf  religious  teaching,    -^n  Temple  -^srael  ^n 
Boston,  one  can  find  one  of  the  finest  pieces  of  religious 
educational  work  being  carried  on  that  can  be  found  anywhere. 

Another  very  valuable  agency  which  the  church  is 
using  for  puri-oses  of  religious  teaching  in  their  -inter- 
mediate and  Senior  a^e  groups,  is  trie  young  people's 
"institute"  or  conference.    Tj'-pical  examples  of  this  activity 
are  fojind  in  the  meetings  at  Starr  Islana,  ■'•sIgs  of  Shoais, 
where  the  unitarian  yoimg  people  have  their  conference; 


G 


-46- 

lasell  Seminary,  Au"biirndale ,  Mass.,  where  the  J-»ew 
England  Conference  Epv/orth  League  is  held;  liorthfield 
llass.,  where  the  Christian  Endeavor  Society,  gathers. 
It  is  infinitely  more  thpji  the  nane  implies--:  t  is 
-  time  when  they  live,  play,  andstudy  together  and 
especially  have  sJi  opportunity  to  gain  new  ideas  and 
ideals  and  to  express  these  ideals  in  some  form  of 
service . 

The  program,  usually  consists  of  cla"?::^es  in 
the  morning;   (such  subjects  as  Bible,  iiyionology, 
Hlssions,  r^acial  i^rejudices,  leadership  training 
courses,  preparing  to  teech  in  church  school  or  to 
lead  young  people's  groups,  are  offered);  an  or- 
ganized program  of  recreation  in  the  afternoon;  a 
t- ■  "  ight  'iiscussion  hour  when  the  group  divides  in- 
to informal  discussion  groups  to  tal>-  over  personal 
problems;  an  evening  meeting  when  various  fields  of 
"life  service"  are  discussed  by  people  vvho  have  entered 
that  field--one  night  a  doctor,  another  a  minister, 
a  newspaperman,  a  business  man,  etc.,  will  tell  the 
opportunities  for  service  in  the  field  he  has  chosen. 
The  remainder  of  the  evening  is  given  over  to  enter- 
tainment planned  by  the  young  people — a  play  or 
pageant  or  party  of  some  sort. 

This  program  has  been  presented  at  some 
length,  because  it  seemsto  illustrate    eo  well  a  vejry 


-47- 

iiaportant  factor  in  religious  teaching.     The  church 
has  certainly  found  here  a  powerful  form  of  teaching — 
it  is  prol^alJly  no  exagee^ation  to  say  that  for  many 
of  the  young  people  attending  such  conferences,  more 
real  appreciations  and  wholesome  attitudes  are  ac- 
quired than  in  a  whole  year  of  ordinp.ry  church  school 
work.     The  fact  that  for  an  entire  week  a  group  of 
young  people  live  together  with  the  dominent  note  of 
their  meeting  a  desire  to  find  out  how  they  can  fit 
"better  into  life,  makes  at  the  very  outlet,  an  ideal 
situation.     Anything  learned  is  learned  so  intensely 
that  it  tends  to  have  a  compelling  force  that  will 
carry  it  over  into  ration.     With  a  sympathetic  and 
understanding  faculty,  the  possibilities  for  guiding 
and  stimulating  young  people  in  this  very  impression- 

a'ble  age  are  very  great.     The  fact  that  definite 

to 

avenues  of  service  are  opened  to  them     give  them  an 
outlet  for  the  new  ideals  and  loyalties  they  acquire 
makes  these  teachings  heaii^ruit  in  "better  living. 
Here,  probably  more  than  in  eJiy  other  one  place  has 
the  religious  teachirig  follov;ed  out  the  teachings  of 
psychology  and  done  ^ust  those  things  v/hich  tend  to 
bring  about  the  desired  results. 

Closely  allied  to  the  institutes  are  the 
summer  camps,  maintained  by  various  organizations 


r 


-48- 

within  the  church,   to  which  children  may  go  for  from 
one  to  six  weeks  during  the  summer.     injb,ddition  to 
the  regulsr  activities  found  at  a  cai::p,  similar  pro- 
grams as  are  found  in  institutes  are  carried  on,  for 
young  people  of  high  school  age,  while  for  younger 
children  it  is  adapted  accordingly.     It  is  the  atti- 
tude of  "right  living"  that  permeates  such  a  place 
that  is  prohalDly  the  most  stimulating  force  in 
creating  nev/  ideals  and  responses. 

v/hile  it  is  true,  as  Kieth  points  out,  that 
three  out  of  four  children  who  are  in  the  Sunday 
School  leave  it  forever  after  the  age  of  twelve, 
there  is  still  a  large  numlter  reached  "by  the  church 
even  after  they  pass  beyond  the  high  school  level. 
The  young  people's  conferences  are  undoubtedly  aiding 
this  as  they  mal'ie  their  appeal  to  young  people  at 
just  the  age  when  the  Sunday  Scriool  often  begins  to 
lose  its  hold  on  them. 

For  these  young  people  who  are  still  in- 
terested in,  and  for  all  others  still  needing,  re- 
ligious teaching,  the  church  in  some  places  is  able 
to  offer  teaching  on  the  college  level,     A  complete 
Sunda^y  Church  School  will  have  classes  for  young 
people  and  even  adults,  but  outside  of  that  there  aEe 


-49- 

still  opportunities  v>'here  tl.e  church  can  and  does 
help.     ■'-n  this  group  would  come  the  denominational 
college,  which  in  addition  to  giving  liheral  studies, 
would  incorporate  in  its  curriculum  many  things  valuable 
as  religious  teaching.     Many  universities  now  iiave 
Schools  of  Religious  Education,  whose  purpose  is  to  give 
further  religious  teaching  in  order  that  is  graduates 
in  turn  may  enter  into  the  teaching  ministry  of  the 
church. 

Throughout  all  her  educational  program  the 
church  males  use  of  a  factor  that  d-  serves  more 
recognition  than  is  Qometi.'.es  paid  to  it,  since  it  is 
an  important  influence  in  carrying  out  religious  ideals. 
Soneone  has  said  "Let  me  v/rite  the  enngs  of  a  nation 
and  I  care  not  who  'lakes  her  laws."     It  is  true  that 
music  is  a  powerful  medium,  having  the  universal  ap- 
peal that  it  does.    Unfortunately  the  church  has  not 
always  in  the  past  used  the  "best  type  of  music,  to 
inculcate  those  ideals  of  service  which  is  the  aim  of 
tr-j.e  religion.     But  this  s:">irit  is  rapidly  coming  in 
and  should  do  much  to  help.     A  typical  example  of  the 
new  type  is  "The  Kev/  Hymnal  for  Ai';erican  Youth"  edited 
"by  H.  Augustine  Smith,  which  while  prenerving  the  "best 
of  the  well  known ehurch  music,  sounds  also  the  note  of 
"service . " 


For  examples  see  Pp.  227,2?;9,S37  Also  sections  on  *-orld 
friendship,  Pp .  2840297.  aIso  sections  in  hack  of  hymnals 


r 


c 


-50- 

Ghapter  Eight 
The  Public  School--. <hat  is  it  Doing? 

When  from  so  many  sides  we  hear  the  cry  raised 
that  the  Aneric-;n  pub_ic  school  is  "godless"  and  iias  no 
care  for  religion  of  any  ]-:ind ,  it  would  seem  as  if  it 
was  not  a  fertile  field  to  explore  for  evidences  of  re- 
ligious teaching.     Such,  however,  does  not  seem  to  be 
the  case.     Of  course,  one  does  not  find,  e.s  in  the  old 
days  when  it  was  the  expres'i^ed  purpose  of  the  school  to 
give  such  instruction,   courses  labeled  as  having  that 
content  and  being  for  that  purpose  .     Indeed  the  value 
of  such  courses  might  v/ell  be  q_uestioned,   even  if  it 
were  possible  in  this  day  and  age  to  have  them.     It  is 
obviously  imposable  today  in  a  country  whose  public 
schools  are  open  to  everyone,  to  go  as  far  in  religious 
teaching  as  tlie  churcix  can  and  must  go,  without  being 
extremely  unfair  to  the  beliefs  of  some  of  the  people. 
Yet  it  is  eq.ually  obvious  that  something  is  being  done. 

In  some  states  the  reading  of  a  certain  number 
of  verses  from  the  Bible  is  req^uired  at  the  opening  of 
school.     Since  in  most  places  this  can  not  be  accompanied 
by  any  interpretation  and  comment,  it  is  felt  that, 
especially  v/ith  the  younger  children,  it  has  little 
meaning  and  conseq.uent ^y  is  not  significant  as  a  factor 
in  religious  teaching.     But  vv'e  know  that  hundreds  of 
teachers,  through  wise  choice  of  reading  have  given 


r 


c 


-51- 


n&xiy  children  an  appreciation  of  many  of  the  great  funda- 
mental truths  of  the  Bible. 

The  familiar  words  of  the  "Shepherd  Psalm"  mpy 
fall  without  thought  from  the  lips  of  the  average  person, 
"but  to  a  fev/  it  v/ill  he  meaningful.     In  smaller  tovms 
where  the  children  do  not  represent  such  a  variety  of 
religious  doctrines,  a  teacher  can  do  a  great  deal  in 
making  vivid  to  then  the  greatest  stories  of  the  Bible. 

School  subjects  are  so  entangled  with  religious 
history  that  it  is  very  difficult  to  escape  teaching  it. 
While  facts  r lone  have  little  motivating  power,  yet 
they,  being  the  basis  of  the  concepts  that  become  com- 
pelling forces,  have  an  important  place. 

"The  high  school  history  course  and  especially 
the  ancient  history  course,   should  teach  the  reJigions 
of  the  peoples  studied.     in  the  anc '  ent  histor;>  course 
as  developed  in  our  high  schools  today  v/e  have  an  ex- 
cellent opportunity  to  expose  the  young  folks  to  the 
religions  of: 


1. 

Primitive  man 

2. 

The 

Indian 

• 

The 

Chinese 

4. 

The 

Egypt  ia,ns 

5. 

The 

Babylonians 

6. 

The 

Persians 

7  . 

The 

Greeks 

8  . 

The 

Horn  an  s 

V/e  co^.ilc  develop e  in  a  beautiful  way  the 
philosophy  of  Erahriann  srn ,  Buddism,  Judaism,  Gon- 
fusicinism  and  Christianity,  and  after  we  finish  mar- 
Boston  University 
School  of  Educatio^^ 
Library. 


-52- 

vel  in  the  "beauty  of  these  religions  and  he  surprised 
that  after  all  they  are  fund araen tally  tiie  same.* 

'An  interesting  exi^ernraent  was  cariied  oul  hy 
a  history  teacher  in  a  Jun  or  High  School  near  Boston. 
After  a  study  in  Ancient  History,  which  included  the 
religions  of  th^  Tari ous  peoples,  whijh  he  tried  to 
present  in  such  a  v/ay  ap  to  give  the  pupils  an  ides  of 
the  good  points  of  each  religion  involved,  he  asked 
theiu  to  \:v^.-*:<^  ^     o-or-,  tpllin?  •.•rhr  t  the  study  of  these 
various  reiie,ions  had  done  for  them.     j-'hese  papers  were 
to  "be  passed  in  without  any  identifying  marks,   so  that 
the;-  could  write  Just  how  t!iey  r'elt.     Some  of  tlie  papers 
showed  little  thoi^ht,  others  very  ofeviously  said  v/hat 
they  felt  v/as  expected,  hut  a  fev/  gave  indications  that 
their  v/rnters  had  been  gripped  "by  the  idea  of 
"tolerai.ce"  ,   i.e.,   they  realized  that  there  was  something 
to  respect  in  thinking  not  thoir  cvm.** 

■.'/hi  le  it  -i  s  true  that  the  schools  in  the  r:ain 
give  moral  rather  than  religious  training  (the  character 
education  programs  so  prevalent  today  would  he  of  t.his 
type)  yet  undouhtedly  they  are  doing  much  in  giving 
something  upon  wliich  the  church    can  huild.  Charters 
echoes  this  same  feeling  in  aaying : 

-^A. J.i:urphy ,   "Teaching  History-  as  a  Social  Study  in  the 
Senior  High  Schoo; ,  Lester's  the^-is,  1931,  P.  30 
Sarie.     See  Pp.  22-36  for  examples 


-53- 


"As  I  understand  its  meaning,  religious  education 
transcends  moral  education  "but  is  based  upon  it. 
Children  may  "be  taught  to  he  moral  through  the 
use  of  either  moral  or  religious  sanctions. 
Religious  education  relates  morality  to  the  con- 
cept of  Ood;  Moral  education  hases  liorality  on 
the  concept  of  good,     Both  develop  a  moral 
structure  withsf.'the  individual,     l^ach  is  striving 
for  ends  which  have  much  in  common.     BotK  seeli  to 
develop  the  virtuEs  of  goodness,  unselfishness, 
courage,  and  industry.    Puhlic  schools  cj-id  church 
schools  are  cooperating  agencies.     .Whatever  of 
morals  the  public  schools  may  develop  is  so  much 
gain  for  the  chui'ch  schools.     The  public  schools, 
therefore,  may  aid  religious  education  by  develop- 
ing the  basic  virtues  to  the  utmost  t]:irough 
industry  and  intellig-^nce .     what  they  develop 
rqligious  ed'.'.cation  does  not  need  to  repeat, 
T;:  the  extent  that  they  develop  moral  habits 
and  attitudes  the  task  of  inducing  religious 
experience  will  lie  made  easier.     A  moral  man  is 
a  betteijteub ject  for  religious  experience  than 
a  criminal."* 

But  while  the  public  school  can  not  do  much 

of  the  a,ctual  teaching  of  religion  herself,  as  has  been 

intimated,  in  some  cases  ."^he  is  cooperating  with  the 

chuch.     For  example  in  some  states,  as  in  l:orth  Bakota, 

the  state  maJces  out  a  syllabus  in  Biblical  History,  and 

pupils  who  can  pass  an  examination  based  on  this  course 

can  receive  credit.     So  a  church  can  offer  such  a  course, 

give  as  much  interpretation  as  it  feels  it  should,  and, 

since  the  pupil  usually  takes  such  work  more  seriously, 

much  can  be  accomplished. 


6 


*y/.w.  Charters,   "What  the  Public  Schools  Can  and  Cannot 
Bo  in  lieligious  Education"     international  Journal  of 
Religious  Education,  l^^overaber  1928,  P.  10 


r 


-54- 

Chapter  Kine 
The  Private  School--What  is  it  Doing? 

As  v/e  have  seen,  in  spite  of  the 
restrictions  necessarily  placed  upon  them  "by  virtue  of 
the  fact  that  they  must  serve  all  the  people  without 
favoring  any  one  particular  belief,  the  public  school 
does  directly  and  indirectly  give  religious  teaching 
and  aid  the  church  to  give  it.    liow  much  more  then  should 
the  private  school  be  able  to  do,   since,  in  many  cases, 
it  does  not  have  this  same  problcL.  to  contend  with. 
Also,  since  in  some  cases  it  has  the  children  for  all 
their  time  (as  when  a  school  has  both  resident  a,nd  day 
pupils)  it  has  further  opportunity  for  giving  religious 
teaching.     Let  us  see  to  what  extent  these  agencies  take 
advantage  of  its  opportunities  in  this  respect. 

'nVe  might  divide  our  private  schools  into  two 
different  groups  on  the  basis  of  their  pur pose--those 
maintained  by  various  churphes  so  that  their  children 
may  have,  together  with  their  secular  teaching,  those 
religious  teachings  which  they  are  not  able  to  get  in 
the  public  schoo.ls ;  and  those  private  schools  that  have 
the  same  purposes  as  the  public  school,  but  are  in 
existance  because  some  people  feel  they  can  do  the  "./ork 
better  than  the  public  schools,  having  more  money  at 
their  disposal  and  not  having  to  overcrowd  as  do  the 
public  schools  sometimes.     Some  of  thera  are  founded  for 
the  purpose  of  carrying  out  some  new  methods  or  pro- 
gressive theory  of  educati on--such  as  the  Siiady  Hill 


-55- 


School  in  Broolcline.     Liaziy  of  the  schools  on  the 
secondary  level  are  "descendants"  from  schools 
founded  in  the  early  days  "by  public  spirited  people  who 
wished,  in  a  day  v/hen  education  was  not  as  free  as  it 
is  today,  to  give  more  people  a  chance  for  further  edu- 
cation.    They  are  r.ow  usually  thought  of  as  "prepara- 
tory"    F?chools- -Bradford  Academy  for  girls  and  Philips 
Andover  for  boys,  are  examples  of  this  type  of  school. 

In  this  latter  group  we  find  that  they  can  not 
do  much  riore  in  the  way  of  direct  religious  teaching 
than  can  the  public  school,  since  they  are  in  most 
cases  working  with  people  of  almost  as  many  beliefs  as 
do  the  oublic  schools,  and  hence  in  fairness  to  them 
all  do  not     ish  to  offer  any  denominational  teachings. 
However,  especially  in  the  case  of  the  older  established 
schools  there  is  so  much  tradition  surrounding  them  that 
the  very  atmosphere  seems  to  radiate  many  of  those 
qualities  sought  for  by  the  road  of  religious  teaching. 
Living  together  with  students  of  many  different  faiths, 
as  the  resident  students  do,   it  often  helps  to  develop 
a  tolerance  and  respect  for  the  good  in  other  religions 
that  is  so  greatly  to  be  desired. 

It  is  quite  different  with  the  schools  founded 
by  various  denominations,  however,  ^^ere  their  expressed 
purpose  is  to  give  the  children  those  religious 


-56- 

teachings  which  will  make  them  loyal  followers  of 
their  church. 

If  the  church  maintains  hei^wn  schools  she  can 
.ut  in  them  as  much  religious  teaching  as  she  sees  fit. 
In  the  Roman  Catholic  schools,  as  indicated  in  their 
church  school  curriculum,  we  find  that  the  religious 
teaching  is    orked  in  with  theiij^ther  school  subjects. 
A  series  known  as  the  "standard  Catholic  Headers  hy 
Grades",  is  used;  it  contains  stories  such  as  you  would 
find  in  many  school  readers  with  especial  emphasis  on 
stories  ahout  saints  and  iiartyers  of  the  Christian 
church.     A  Catechism  of  Christian  I^octrine,  which  is 
also  ohtainahle  for  use  in  all  grades  is  also  used. 
The  Catholic  Education  Series  used  in  the  Sunday 
church  school  is  also  made  use  of. 

In  the  Lutheran  schools  the  "Little 
Catechism"  of  -artin  Luther  is  used;  and  a  thorough  study 
of  the  his  tor:'  of  his  life  and  works  and  "beliefs  is  in- 
cluded.    Schools  ar*e  maintained  on  the  elementary, 
grammar,  secondary  and  college  levels. 

Other  denominations  have^iOt  strong  schools 
such  as  these  two  denominations  have,  hut  feel  rather 
that  their  children  should  attend  public  school  and 
get  their  religious  teaching  in  some/other  way. 

This  brings  up  a  problem  so  closely  allied  to 


-57- 

oior  own  that  it  seems  pertinent  to  discuss  it  here.    Is  there  any 
justificatio  .  for  the  existance  of  parochial  schools?    The  tencency 
today  seeais  to  be  to  condemn  theraf.s  undemocratic.    Athearn  in  his 
book  "Religious  Education  and  American  Democracy"  senses  this 
feeling  whe..  he  says,  "If  religion  is  an  essentii.l  factor  in  educa- 
tion and  if  religion  can  not  be  satisfactorily  taught  in  the  public 
school,  is  not  the  church  co^ripelled  to  w  thdravi,''  her  children  and 
have  parochial  schools?    Yex  public  schools  are  necessary  in  a 
democarcy  where  people  must  have  a  co.:anon  body  of  knowledge,  ideals 
and  standards."* 

How  can  we  reconcile  these  two  points?    If  we  want  both 
the  religious  teacliing  to  insure  good  conduct,  which  teaching  the 
church  can  best  provide,  and  the  unifying  experience  cf  the  public 
school,  which  it  is  felt  is  hindered  by  the  segregation  of  pupils 
in  various  church  schools,  then,  otvicusly,  there  must  be  some  ad- 
justment somewhere. 

But,  although  our  putlic  can  not  give,  as  we  have  pointed 
out,  adequate  religious  teaching,  does  that  mean  that  the  only  al- 
ternative method  is  to  have  the  churches  take  over  the  entire  educa- 
tional work?    %'e  have  already  intimated  that  there  are  other  y/ays  in  . 
which  they — the  school  and  church — can  cooperatively  attain  their 
ends — and  th^it  much  more  can  be  done  along  tbis  line  will  be  in- 
dicated later.    Therefore  it  wdtild  seem  unnecessary  for  the  church 


^    Vi.S.Athear.-  "Religious  Education  and  American  Democracy"    P.  25 


I 


-58- 


to  carry  this  oftentimes  heavy  burden  of  an  entire  educational 
program,  but  rather  they  can  specialize  in  religious  teaching  alone. 


-59- 

Chapter  Ten 
What  le  Being  Done  Through  Other  Agencies 

While  we  think  cf  our  public,  private  and  church  schools 
as  being  the  chief  agencies  through  which  our  chdldren  receive  re- 
ligious teacliing,  we  must  not  lose  sight  of  the  fact  that  there 
are  ether  org  -nizai,ions  who,  while  they  would  not  perhaps  be  in- 
cluded under  formal  educational  agencies,  tive  ::iuch  valuable 
materiel  dealing  with  tiras  theme  in  their  programs. 

Growing  out  of  the  Christian  church  has  come  an  organiza- 
tion yrhich  probably  does  more  in  the  line  of  religious  teaching  than 
people  sometimes  realize — the  iou-ig  Men's  Christian  Association. 
It  prcuides  an  opportunity  to  express  the  Christian  principles  it 
teaches  in  Christian  service,  which  is  undoubted  y  one  of  the 
reasons  it  makes  such  an  appeal  to  young  people.    Through  its  recreationa], 
ed".  cational  ..nd  religious  educational  program  it  reaches  many  of 
the  boys  that  the  church  joses  during  the  "teen  age." 

A  great  deal  of  their  religious  teaching  is  carried  on 
through  their  discussion  gro.ps  held  in  connection  v/ith  their  summer 
camp  work,  and  during  the  winter  at  their  vaiious  local  headquarters. 
The  Boston  brnch  during  the  year  1930-51  carried  on  an  interesting 
course  of  study  in  "Understanding  Religion",  a  course  cf  four 
lectures  and  discussion  periods  under  the  direction  of  able 
religious  le-j.ders.    A  relig'ous  foi^jm  was  also  held  each  week  from 
October  to  April,  at  v/i-dch  time  various  aspects  of  modern  religious 


-60- 


life  were  presented  and  dis cussed. 

The  Y.        C.  A.  through  a  similar  program  accomplishes 
similar  7;ork  for  girls. 

The  work  cf  both  these  organizations  may  he  sum.ried  up  in 
the  idea  that  they  are  touching  the  life  of  young  people  in  all  of 
its  phases  (educational,  social,  industrial)  and  interpreting  them 
all  from  a  religious  viewpoint. 

While  both  cf  the  organizations  have  junior  members  yet 
we  thinx  of  them  as  serving  chiefly  the  older  young  people.  There 
are  other  orgnizatlons  which  take  care  of  the  younger  people  who 
also  do  much,  directiy  and  indirectly,  in  the  way  of  religious 
teac  ing.    Gae  of  the  best  known  of  these  is  the  Girl  and  Boy  Scout 
movement.    Because  they  are  non-sectarian  in  clmracter  they  are  con- 
fronted with  much  the  same  problem  as  the  public  school  so  that  their 
religious  teacidngs  are  al>TOst  the  same  as  the  character  education 
work  carried  on  in  the  schools.    However,  when  t:oops  are  formed  in 
connection  with  any  particu.-ar  church  it  gives  an  opportunity  to 
link  up  the  ideals  anc^oyalties  fostered  by  this  movement,  i/ith 
the  particular  teachings  of  the  church.    Due  to  their  emphs.sis  on 
out-of-door  things  the  child  is  often  given  an  appreciation  of 
natiire  which  is  truly  religious  in  its  effect. 


<-    The  Art  cf  Living,  monograph  issued  by  Boston  Y.M.G.A.,  1950 


-61- 

The  Ca^np  Fire  Girls  parallel  the  work  of  the  Girl 
ScoutE  a.id  through  their  work  ha.ve  proved  helpful  in  the 
.natter  of  forming  right  attitudes. 

There  are  various  adult  org-.niEat  ons  w  ich  are  built 
upon  principles  of  re^^^igious  teachings,  stressing  partici;larly 
the  ideal  cf  religion  as  expressed  in  service  to  one's  f ellovvmen. 
Typical  examples  of  such  organizations  are  the  fraternal  orders, 
such  as  the  ^tsons;  Knights  of  Columbus,  Knights  of  Pythias,  etc. 
Since  these  are  secret  orders  only  raenibers  are  familar  with  some 
of  the  progr-.-ii  they  have  for  religious  teaching,  and  so  only 
general! zat-ons  can  be  ;.iade  rega.  aing  it. 


-62- 


Chapter  Eleven 
Measuring  the  Results  of  Religious  Teachings 

We  have  found  that  from  the  standpoint  of  the  psy- 
chologist, there  i^much  in  real  rexig  cus  teachJ.ng  that  serves  as 
a  tremendous  dynamic  to  right  action;  vre  have  found  tliat  especially 
the  church,  but  also  the  public  and  private  schools,  ;i:id  both  adult 
and  young  people's  organizations  are  carrying  on  a  program  which  has 
many  elements  of  j^eliglous  teaching  in  them;  it  would  seem  then  as 
if  the  conclusion  was  inevitable,  that  v.e  should  make  further  use  of 
this  factor  if  we  wish  to  iiave  those  sort'-' of  responses  i  volved  in 
the  idea  of  good  social  and  civic  conduct.    But  are  re  sure  that 
tlie  psychologists  are  right  and  that  the  teachings  will  do  all  that 
is  claimed  for  them. 

If  we  wish  to  know  whether  teaching  of  many  other  ty^  ss 
workf ,  we  can  test  it;  for  exa/aple,  if  v.'e  desire  to  teach  fract  ons 
v.e  can  rive  problems  involving  this  new  knowledge  which  will  soon 
prove  whether  or  not  the  teac  ing  accomplished  its  aim.    Have  any 
tests  been  devised  by  which  we  can  actually  measure  whether  or  not 
certain  religious  teachings  have  resulted  in  changed  attitudes? 
Until  yevy  recently  there  was  jio  attempt  to  do  anything  of  this 
sort  but  now  such  tests  are  being  devised  and  w.iile  they  are 

still  very  much  in  an  experimental  stage,  it  is  interesting  to 
study  them  to  see  what  they  revei.l. 


( 


-65- 


That  educators  have  felt  the  need  of  such  tests  is 
apparent.    As  one  writer  has  said,  "Hundreds  of  millions  of 
dollars  are  probably  spent  annually  by  churches,  Sunday  Schools, 
and  other  organizations  for  children  and  youth,  with  alaost  no 
check  on  the  product — a  negligence  cf  which  no  modern  industry 
would  be  guilty,  and  which  the  public  schools  have  rather  generally 
outgrown  so  far  as  ro  tine  sclx>ol  work  is  concerned.  Nevertheless, 
although  tests  exist  for  predicting  success  in  parti cuar  school 
studies,  in  school  work  in  general,  and  in  various  occupations,  which 
have  real  va  ue  in  saving  the  time  of  individuals  and  the  money  of 
the  school  system,  yet  there  are  no  tests  for  predicting  success  in 
living.    i'oT  lack  of  them  a  vast  cjnount  of  time  anu  no  one  .vnows  how 
much  money  are  probably  thrown  away  on  expensive  and  intricate 
devices  for  _:oral  and  religious  education,  a  id  on  more  or  less 
futile  attempts  to  live  well  in  a  vrorld  whose  problems  people  are 
inadequately  prepared  to  meet.--- 

One  of  th^ost  interesting  studies  in  this  connection 
was  iiia'-e  by  Hartsiiorne  and  May,  under  the  auspices  of  the 
Institute  of  Social  and  Religious  Research,  working  in  cooperation 
with  Columbia  University.    ThJ.s  research  v/as  undertaken  as  an  out- 
growth of  a  resolut  on  adopted  in  the  1922  meetixag  of  the 

Religious  Education  Associ^ition,  when  they  voted  to  atte.upt  a 
ti 

*Hartshorne  and  May,  Studies  in  Deceit,    P.  5-6 


{ 


-64- 


"carefi.il  and  scientific  investigation  of  the  question  'How  is  re- 
ligion being  taught  to  young  people,  and  with  what  effect?"'^ 
After  much  discussion  the  following  course  of  action  was  agreed 
upon;-?^ 

1,  Study  the  actual  experiences  of  children  wMch  have 
mor  J.  and  religious  significance  and  the  effects  for  periods  of 
time  of  the|iioral  and  religious  influences  to  which  crdldren,  youth, 
and  adilts  liave  been  exposed. 

2.  Apply  the  objective  methods  of  the  laboratory/  to  the 
measurement  of  conduct  under  controlled  conditions. 

5,    Engage  one  oi^niore  full-time  investigators  and 
associate  wLzh  them  advisers  and  assistants. 

4.  Secure  collaboration  by  various  institutions  and 

groups . 

5.  Make  the  results  of  the  study  available  in  both 
technical  and  populi.r  forms. 

The  research  lasted  five  years  in  all  and  the  results 
have  been  published  by  the  investigators  in  three  volumes.  Each 
volxame    deals  with  a  different  phase  of  character  or  conduct: 
Volume  One:    Studies  in  Deceit 

Volxame  Two:     Studies  in  Service  and  Self  Control 
Volume  Three:  Studies  in  the  Organization  of  Character 
The  initial  volume,  "Studies  in  Deceit" ,  reports  on  an  attempt  to 

^Hartshorne  and  ^ay.  Studies  in  Deceit,  Foreword  P.v 
^-  Same,  foreword,  P.  VI 


i 


-55- 


devise  such  tests  as  woiild  Indicate  if  one  weakness  which  seems  to 
be  very  prevelent  in  our  social  life  today — the  tendency  tcTfard 
deceit — is  lessened  as  a  res  J-t  of  religious  teacing.    The  in- 
vestigators developed  a  large  number  of  deception  tests;  twenty- 
two  using  ordinary  classroom  situations;  four  usin^:  athlotic  coa- 
tests;  two,  parties;  and  one,  work  done  at  home.    Tv.'o  lying  tests 
and  two  stealing  tests  vfere  also  worked  out. 

These  tests  widch  were  tried  out  on  about  eleven 
thousand  cluldren  from  the  a.es  of  eight  to  sixteen,  revealed  some 
curious  res  alts.    For  exsuaple,  it  was  found  that  those  enrolled  in 
Protestant  Sunday  schools  chested  less  than  those  not  enrolled. 
However,  those  wlio  attended  regularly  were  no  more  honest  than  th.cse 
who  seldom  attended,    ■'•t  would  seem  that  if  contact  v/ith  a  Sunday 
School  tended  to  make  one  aicre  honest,  that  the  more  frequent  the 
contact  the  stronger  the  impulse  toward  honesty.    This  moy  be  ac- 
coxinted  for  by  the  fact  that  the  cz-ild  v;l:o  reg-ularly  attends  church 
school  under  present  conditons,  gets  little  more  than  the  one  v/ho 
rarely  attends,  for  so  many  attend  irregularly  that  is  is  necessary 
to  constantly  review  and  go  over  ground  for  the  benefit  of  the 
irregular  ones,  and  therefore  little  real  headway  is  possible. 

A  rather  alarming  situation  was  discovered  in  another 
instance.    It  was  fo^Jind  that  children  belongj|^^  certain  organizations 
of  w:ich  one  of  the  aims  is  to  teach  honesty,  were  more  deceitful 
than  those  not  belonging,    -^n  one  organizatfon  length  of  membership 
and  rank  achieved  were  positively  cor^llated  v;ith  decsptiveness.*-^ 


Hartshorne  and  May,  Studies  in  Deceit,  ?.  411 

Sarae 


-66- 

This  would  seem  to  make  out  a  rather  discouraging 
case  for  religious  teaching,  u  itil  we  t.'0  back  beyond  the  lacts 
which  these  tests  reveal  into  the  reasons  for  them — and  fortunate- 
ly these  investigators  did  not  stop  at  getting    mere  facts  but 
looked  for  the  :aot,ive  beidnd  the  act,  with  the  result  that  they 
came  to  the  following  encouraging  conclusion:     in  itiany  cases  the 
c.  ildren  did  not  f  eel  tiey  were  doing  anything  wrong;  it  T^as  a  case 
of  the  "end  justifying  the  means",  as  for  example,  they  ha.d  had  ini- 
pressed  upon  them  that  it  vfo.s  a  comraondable  thing  to  do  well  in 
class  work — hence  If  they  could  d>.  it  in  no  other  v^-ay,  they 
cheated  in  order  to  appear  to  do  it  well.    If  the  child  ?:as  led 
to  feel  that  the  greatest  value  v/as  in  being  fair,  rather  than  in 
leading  the  class  it  would  lessen  the  desire  to  cheat.  This 
attitude  has  been  v.'ell  summed  up  in  one  of  the  conclus  .ons  to  v/liich 

the  investigators  came:     "Vihere  conflict  arises  between  a  child 
and  his  environment,  deception  is  a  natural  iuode  of  adjustment,  havi 
in  itself  no  "moral"  significance.    If  indirect  ways  of  gaining  his 
ends  are  successful,  they  will  be  continued  unless  definite  training 
is  undertaken  tlir^-Ugh  v.'liich  direct  and  honest  methods  may  also  .le- 
come  successful". 

Evidently  the  fault  lies  not  with  the  reli^us  teaching 
but  v^ith  the  way  it  is  taught.    Too  much  of  it  has  been  merely 
meaningless  platitudes,  not  identified  \n  the  child 'smind  with  a 
happy  result. 


*    Harts  lorne  and  i^y.  Studies  in  Deceit,  P.  412 


-67- 


Then  too,  deceit  is  a  very  difficult  thing  to  use  as  a 
test  of  effectiveness  of  teacliings  because  v/e  are  not  entirely  sure 
that  deception  is  always  harmful — for  example  we  tldnk  it  perfectly 
justifiable  for  a  doctor  to  deceive  a  very  sick  patient  as  to  his 
condition.    H^w,  then,  can  v;e  teach  unsv/erving  honesty  v»'hen  we  do  not 
always  follow  it,  or  even  expect  to  follov,^  it? 

As  the  author  points  out,  any  moral  implications  that 
arise  from  these  studies  of  deceptive  tendencies  are  obviously 
tentative  and  incomplete,    ^et  they  do  stand  as  a  decided  step  in 
a  forward  direction,  for  \.  checking  up  on  our  results,  even  if  it 
isjiJot  possible  to  ao  it  v.-ith  a  fine  degree  of  accuracy,  is  vastly 
better  than  no  check  at  all  and  gives  us  some  indications  of  how 
to  modify  our  procedures  in  order  to  achieve  better  results. 

Volume  Two  presents  two  extremely  interesting  phases  of 
good  social  and  civic  conduct — the  cliaracteris  oics  of  service  and 
self  control.     In  attempting  to  test  vzhether  or  not  attendance  at 
Sunday  School  had  any  aifect  on  the  development  of  these  character- 
istics ,  the  investigators  tried  to  secure  data  as  to  the  number  of 
ciiildren  who  had  attended  Sunday  School,  how  regularly  they 
attended  (i.e.  how  many  times  a  month)  and  how  many  years  they  had 

attended.    They  felt  that  their  data  wr.s  not  exactly  accurate,  be- 
cause since  the  children  represented  so  many  widely  scattered  Suiiday 
Schools  it  was  not  thought  practical  to  attempt  to  check  back  to 
the  schools  to  find  out  about  their  attendance  and  so  they  had  to 


-68- 


relj  on  the  children's  statements  as  to  how  often  they  v:ent  and  for 
how  many  years.    However,  since  they  used  children  from  three 
different  communities  in  tlxLs  inquiry,  and  the  resiilts  seemed  to  be 
fairly  consistent  from  population  to  ppulation  they  felt  they  had 
a  decree  of  reliability. 

The  scores  on  these  tests  indicated  th.::t  charitable  and 
cooperative  tendencies  are  probably  associated  with  the  -.-mount  and 
reg'-.larity  of  Sunday  School  attendance.  The  association  is  small, 
however.^ 

The  authors  condL  ude  tha':.  as  in  the  case  of  tendencies 
to  dsceive,  it  is  apparent  that  such  efforts  to  train  children  in 
forms  of  charitable  and  cooperative  beliavLor  as  our  ordinarily 
used  in  school,  :iave  very  little,  if  any,  effect.      iiven  wLen 
special  attention  is  paid  to  this  problem,  as  in  Sunday  Schools  and, 
telubs,  the  affects,  if  they  be  effects,  are  not  great  enough  to 
make  members  stand  out  as  being  consistently  superior  to  non- 
member  s.->^- 

In  testing  the  effects  of  religious  teaching  on  the 
characteristic  of  self  control,  the  authors  drev;  sonie  interesting 
conclusions.    Two  questions  were  raised:    Are  Jewish  children  more 
per  .-is  cent,  more  long-suffering,  in  accordance  with  popular  con- 
ception of  their  national  characteristic?    Do  Protestant  children 


■«-Hartshorne  and  "lay.  Studies  In  Service  and  Self  Control,  P.  218-24 
■K^    Same    P.  275 


-69- 


ha.ve  a  .-aore  v  riable  ethical  outlook  than  Catholic  children? 
The  authors  feel  thiit  "to  such  questions  as  these  science  v/ill 
soon  be  able  to  find  an  ansv/er.    The  findings  of  the  present 
studies,  are,  of  course,  too  meager  to  be  regarded  as  anything  final. 
They  are  however,  suggestive."    The  Jewish  ch-ildren  rank  highest  in 
persistence.    Those  vr!:0  attend  Sunday  School  regularly  ranlc  higher 
in  persistance  than  t.  ose  v/ho  do  not  fo.-^ 

Oi  course,  the  objection  may  be  raised  that  persistance 
unless  it  is  in  some  worthy  cause,  may  be  harraf  il  as  well  as 
beneficial.    Hovrever,  assuming  that  right  attitudes  can  be  developed 
so  that  it  t-i  :es  the  right  track,  it  should  prove  a  helpf  .1  f -ctor. 

In  the  next  volume  of  :-heir  series  they  present  some 
ver^   interesting  tests  designed  to  measure  social  intelligence  and 
social  attitudes.    One  interesting  thing  about  these  tests  is  that 
they  use  illustrations  of  actual  situations  which  the  children  are 
apt  to  encounter. 

The  authors  conclude  that  further  study  of  an  experf mental 
nature  will  be  needed  before  the  contribution  of  the  Sunday  School 
to  the  etldcal  insight  and  attitudes  of  the  pupils  can  be 
determined.-^- 

These  tests,  however,  a-9  by  no  means  tlie  only  ones 
that  liave  been  devised  to  test  the  res'ilts  of  religious  teach:' ngs. 

See  Page  35,  Harts horne  and  May,  Studies  in  the  Organization  of 
Character,  for  examples  of  these  tests. 
■J^"-    Saaie  volume.  Page  152  ^ 


-70- 

Watson,  in  ids  book,  "SxparimeiitaT.  on  aad  Measurement  in 
R8lig_ous  3ducat;.on",  devotes  a  nost  interesting  chapter  to  a 
list  CI  tests  -iow  available  widch  include  tests  of  :  biblical 
knowledge,  (true-false,  multiple  choice);     social  prejudices; 
re-  ct ions  to  problems  of  eveiy  day  life;  et'iical  discrimination; 
religious  ideas  and  concepts;    racial,  attitudes .-J^- 

A  partic.J.arly  valuable  t-.ing  about  this  aiaterial  is  that 
it  not  only  tells  v;hat  the  test  is  for  but  points  out  the  way  to 
administer  it,  score  it,  and  other  coraraents  such  ss  where  to  secure 
similar  loaterial,  jrcb~ble  value,  i.e.,  whether  it  is  extremely 
accurate  or  only  approximates  a  measure. 

The  entire  hoolf.  gives  much  practical  material  on  the 
use  of  testing  in  the  work  of  relig-ous  education  and  indicates  that 
much  could  be  dene  in  oiiis  field,  not  only  In  the  way  of  showing 
what  "-.as  been  accomplished,  buthow  more  can  be  achieved  tlrnn  is  at 
present  possible. 

Too  long  ha.s  religious  education  been  carried  on  with 
the  hope  that  it  would  br  ng  tlie  desired  res  Its,  but  with  no 
way  cf  finding  out  until  too  late  whether  or  not  it  actua  ly  did 
it.    That  there  is  an  imperative  need  for  tests  such  as  we  have 
been  describing  is  evident.    Vieth,  in  his  book,  "Teacidng  for 
Christian  Living",  has  well  emphasized  this  need  when  he  says:  "The 
final  test  is  life  itsai-f.  test  cf  irry  methods  as  a  gardener  is 


^-Chajter  no'ir 


-71- 


tha  kind  of  vegetables  widch  I  grow.    Similarly,  the  final  test  of 
a  school  or  a  teacher  is  the  kind  cf  men  and  wo  len  who  go  (;ut  from 
their  influence.    The  test  of  religious  education  is  whetlier  it 
produces  Christian  men  and  women.    But  suppose  I  use  the  wrong 
metiiod  with  my  veget  bles?    My  corn  yields  only  "nubbins"  instead 
of  delicious  ears,    it  is  then  too  late  to  start  the  process  over 
again  and  try  another  method.    I  liave  lost  a  year  from  the  effective 
life  of  asy  garden.    That  i^ot  so  bad  wViere  grocery  stores  a:id 
hucksters  carry  plenty  of  vegeta.les  w  ich  may  be  purchased.  But 
suppose  as  a  teachei^bf  religion  I  use  the  wrong  method,  but  do  not 
discover  my  niistake  until  these  pupils  of  'nine  have  grown  into 
manhood  and  womanhood.    It  is  then  too  lata  to  begin  over  again 
with  a  different  metiiod.    My  failure  has  lott  to  the  Kingdom 
prec  -ous  human  souls  of  inestitiiable  worth.    Thus  it  is  imperative 
that  we  LiB.ve  measures  wherebj-  v.^may  test  our  work  as  wemove  along 
from  week  to  week,  so  th.  t  ever;'  success  may  be  crowned  with  re- 
newed effort  in  that  direction,  and  avery  failure  repaired  as 
quickly  as  possible.    Viith  vegetables  this  is  compo.ratively  easy, 

 7»hen  it  comes  to  human  ch  .racter,  aow  fa'  ch  ha.rder  I  But  when 

we  think  of  the  importance  of  the  .Tiattsr  concersied,  how  much 
more  imperative  that  v.e  iiave  a  method  whereby  we  may  measure 
progress."* 


->    P.H,Vieth,  "Teaching  for  Christian  Living"    ^  2354 


-72- 

While  w^ust  not  feel  undiily  elated  over  these  nev.- 
ef forts  at  testing,  for  they  are  still  experiments,  vet  they 
dc  hold  distinct  promise  of  becoming  an  increasingly  important 
factor  in  adding  to  the  effectiveness,  and  consequently  the  value 
of  religious  teaching. 


BOOK  FOUR 

M  MALYSIS  OF  THS  SPECIFIC  CIVIC  COiJDUCT  SHORTAGE 
—LACK  OF  RESPECT  FOR  LAW. 


-75- 

Chapter  Twelve 
The  ^T'Sent  Situation 

The  study  made  by  Hartshorne  and  Ivlay,  of  two  factors 
which  are  certainly  important  elements  in  tliis  general  concept  of 
"social  and  civic  conauct",  bring  out  the  idea,  suggested  in  a 
previous  chapter,  —  the  necessity  of  making  our  teac^iings  more 
specific  if  we  hope  to  achieve  any  real  results. 

It  would  be  extremely  worthwhile,  therefore,  if  we  could 
make  a  similar  analysis  for  all  the  factors  which  enter  into  this 
concept  of  "good  social  and  civic  conduct",  and  iijraight  give  us  a 
more  scientific  answer  to  our  inquiry  as  to  whether  or  not  religious 
teaching  can  greatly  influence  such  condxict.    There  are  so  many 
ramifications  to  this  problem,  that  it  is  obviously  impossible  to 
attempt  such  a  thing  in  the  confines  of  a  single  stiidy,  however. 
It  would  be  possible  and  p3rhaps  significaat  to  laquire  into  one 
other  phase  of  tliis  concept  w  iich  is  demanding  increased  attention 
today  from  mar^r  q^uarters — the  factor  of  law  observance. 

It  i&  difficult  to  conceive  how  people  can  ever  learn  to 
"live  together  well  in  lai-ge  group  relationships",  unless  they  are 
willing  and  anxious  to  cooperate  in  maintaining  the  laws  wiiich  they 
themselves  have  laid  down  as  riecessary  for  their  guidance.    Is  triis 
an  undijJ.y  pessimistic  outlook,  of  is  there  actual  evidence  tliat 
the  present  situation  is  a  crirtical  one?    Let  us  examine  this  factor 
then,  and  see  if  it  holds  anyth_ng  that  will  challenge  our  thinking. 


-74- 

Sveiyone  is  familiar  with  the  cliaracteristic  atti- 
tude of  the  American  people  that  everything  connected  with 
our  country  is  "bigger  and  better"  than  anything  else  of  its  t 
type  to  be  found  anj'-whsre.    lie  take  great  pride  in  the  vast 
scale  on  w  .ich  we  do  eveiythi.ig.    We  seem  to  iiave  a  jnania  for 
wanting  bi.-.,  things  done  in  a  big  way.    There  is  one  thing, 
however,  about  our  country,  which  is  probably  bi  ger  than  the 
same  t".  Ing  in  laany  other  civilized  countries  of  which  we  are 
not  so  proud — in  fact  in  tliis  particular  line  we  would  gladly 
forego  the  undesirable  disi-inction  of  having  first  place — this 
is  in  our  deplorable  record  for  lawlessness. 

As  one  writer  has  so  aptly  phr  .sed  it,  "I'or  a  dozen 
years  the  -eaders  of  the  legal  profession,  social  v.'orkers  and 
laymen  on  the  streets,  have  looked  with  justified  alarm  on 
the  spectacle  of  single  American  cities  indulging  in  more  crime 
a  year  than  all  the  people  of  ureat  Britain — the  menace  cf  ac- 
quired and  chronic  lawlessness.    Crime  commisstons  sit  and 
clean-up  campaigns  come  and  go.    But  every  gre  .t  American  city 
remains  a  dangerous  place  by  day  and  night.    Miorders,  hold-ups, 
homicides; — in  gambling  districts,  in  silk  stocking  areas,  on 
the  grounds  of  our  great  Universities,  in  the  shadow  of  cathedrals. 
What  is  the  cause*    Is  there  no  remedy? 

Why  is  it  th-at  we,  who  come  from  English  traditions. 


*    W.  E.  Dodd    "Our  Ingrowing  Habit  of  Lawlessness, 
Century;  Vol.  116:  P.  691-6    October,  1928 


-75- 

hav9  not  their  respect  for  law?    There  we  do  not  find  people 
making  fun  of  their  laws.    The  low  crime  rate  in  London  is  al- 
most proverbial.    The  unarmed  English  "bobby"  proves  a  most 
effective  protector  of  the  peace.    You  do  lot  see  armoured 
cars  running  through  London  streets,  carrying  the  pay  rolls 
of  London  firms.    They  do  not  need  to.    Wl:^  is  this?  ^ne 
reason,  of  course,  is  the  fact  that  in  England  swift  and  sure 
judgment  is  passed  on  the  offender,  but  .aore  than  thi-S,  as 
«^ames  Tru^slo^'- Adams  p.  ints  out  "there  is  an  alinost  universal 
bac'-ground  of  respect  for  law  and  order."""" 

It  is  no  uncOiMon  thing  here  in  trds  country  for  in- 
telligent and  worthw:iile  citizens  to  publically  proclaim  that 
they  think  people  should  not  support  a  law  in  which  they  do 
not  believe,    iiicholas  ''^urray  Butler,  has  taken  such  an  atti- 
tude toward  the  Prohibition  law.    Samuel  Gompers,  that  great 
champion  of  the  worki:igman,says  tha.t^  he  would  br-aak  any  law  thi 
attempted  to  forbid  railroad  men  to  strike.'-"* 

Even  more  common  is  the  prevailing  belief  that  if  you 
commit  some  more  or  less  serious  infraction  of  the  law  it  can 
oe  "fixed  up",  an  assumption  th:.t  causes  many  people  to  take  a 
rather  cynical  view  of  the  whole  raatter  of  law  observance. 

This  seems  a  rather  black  picture  to  paint  of  our 
American  life.    Yet  it  is,  unfortunately,  only  too  true. 


*    Atlantic  -^onthly,  Dece-aber,  1928 
Same 


-76- 

Chapter  Thirteen 
Causes    of    Lawlessness . 

One  of  the  valuable  lessons  v/e  have  learned  from  our 
scientific  activity,  is  the  idea  of  cause  and  effect.  V<e 
realize  th^t  things  do  not  merely  happen  but  every  effect  rnust 
have  a  cause.    Science  ta.ces  us  further  a.na  Sxiov.s  us  tlv-t  ii  v;  e 
understand  the  cause  v?e  can  someti.jes  control  it  end  thus  regu- 
late the  effect. 

If  this  be  true,  then  it  would  seem  as  if  we. would  do 
well  in  attacking  tbis  problem,  to  inquire  into  the  reasons  wby 
v;e  are  such  lawless  people?         '.vould  then  be  in  a  better 
position  to  suggest  remedies — indeed  until  we  do  attack  the  basic 
causes  any  attempts  at  correction  will  not  be  as  effective  as 
they  otherv.ise  mi^'ht. 

Can  we  disentangle  from  the  mass  of  varying  opin  ons 
and  facts,  any  tangib2.e  material  that  will  enable  us  to  discover 
whiat  are  tie  real  basic,  underlying  causes  for  tMs  traiic  shortage 
in  our  civic  coaduct? 

All  sorts  of  rec.eons  mve  been  advanced  for  this 
situation.    One  cf  the  favorite  excuses  is  to  blame  the  foreigner 
and  hold  him  responsible,  condemning  them  all  as  lawless  indi- 
viduals.   As  a  matter  of  fact, as  Adams  points  out,  foreirners 
do  uot  .Tiake  Americans  lawless  j  on  the  contrary  v  e  rasite  lawbreakers 
of  them,    ihey  come  from  countries  wiich  compelled  them  to  be 
lawabiding — it  isn't  uniil  they  come  here  tirxat  they  commit  crimes 


-77- 

to  any  great  degree.    Of  covTse,  some  oi  the  reason  for  this 
may  lay  in  the  fact  thr.t  the  nej;  environment  bevn.lders  them  and 
because  of  lack  of  adjustment  they  fail  into  criminel  ways,  but 
the  significant  thing  is  tht  here  in  tliis  ccuntrjr  they  have 
apparently  more  opportunity  for  crime — and  less  chance  of 
being  punished  for  it  aftei'  it  is  committed. 

Anothei  factor  to  which  our  lawless  tendencies  are 
often  traced  is  the  great  spirit  of  rectlessness  that  seems  to 
dominate  our  country,     ihere  is  still  a  fever_sh  sort  of  desire 
to  ;ncve  about  such  as  was  clmracteristic  of  the  colonial  days. 
The  California  gold  rush  of  almost  a  hundred  years  a^  o  has  its 
recent  counter -art  in  the  Florida  land  boo").    This  roving  spirit 
has  certainly  affected  the  attitude  toward* law  observance  in 
that  it  has  rja.de  people  chafe  at  restraint,  and  more  recently, 
it  has  aade  it  easier  to  evade  penalty  for  br  ;akine;  the  law. 

The  comparative  youth  cf  tlie  American  people  has  been 
advanced  as  another  cause  for  the  low  regard  for  lav^r,  v/ldch  seems 
to  be  so  chif.racteristic  tocay.    It  is  said  triat  ti.is  is  shov/n 
by  the  fact  that  this  attitude  is  rarely  found  in  loUr  estabMshed 
coimnunities  with  their  trad '.tons  cf  social  obligat  lo  s  and  good 
citizenship. 

"Respect  for  lavv  is  a  plant  of  slow  growth.  If  for 
centuries  laws  s-ve  been  reasonably  sound  and  mpartially  and 
su-Tely  enforced  by  the  lawf.l  authorities,  respect  for  laF  as 
law,  will  increase,    li  on  the"  other  hjand,  laws  are  unreasonable 


-78- 


and  go  contiaiy  to  the  habits  and  desires  of  large  parts  cf  the 
population  and  are  not  enforced  equitably  cr  swiftly,  respect 
for  law  will  decrease.    On  the  whole,  the  first  supposition 
applies  to  tne  history  of  ^  -gland  for  tir-ee  hundred  years  and 
the  second  to  our  ovrn  country. 

This  idea  is  still  further  illustrated  in  the  state- 
ment that  "conscience  and  public  opinion  enforces  the  laws: 
the  police  suppress  the  exceptions. -^-^ 

Dodd,  in  an  article  ■5\Tritten  for  the  Christian  Cent.ry, 

echoes  tl  is  same  fee  ing,  or  at  _east  it  is  intimated  in  his 

II 

attitude,  when  he  says    The  growth  in  crime  has  increased  to 
the   Kint  that  -ife  in  large  cities  has  become  somewhat  pre- 
carious.   The  newspa^^ers  attribute  it  to  the  efforts  of  Pro- 
hibition agents  to  er.iorce  the  ..aw.    Judges  attribute  it  to 
the  incoming  foreigners.    Business  men  say  it  is  the  breakdown 
of  the  judicial  system,    Perhaps  all  of  these  conditons  bear 
an  element  of  truth  and  perhaps  there  are  other  unnamed  causes.. 
E-;t  the:  e  has  been  a  hab  -t  of  lawlessness  in  the  United  States 
from  the  earliest  days —  a  liabit  v,u'dch  iias  influenced  immigrants 
on  their  arrival,  which  has  warped  the  minds  of  the  young, 
which  has  swayed  the  officers  of  the  law  and  w/ich  gravely 
threatens  the  existing  social  order l'-^----^ 

^    J. T. Adams,  "^ur  Jjawless  "-^eritage,  Atlantic  iVlonthly,  Vol.  142 
December,  1928 

A.  T.  Had  ley,  "^a.v  "^king  .:,nd  -"a?*  Enforcement,  Harpers,  Nov.  1925 
-JHHJ-C.E.Dodd,  Our  Ingiowing  ^abit  of  J-'awlessness,  Century,  October 
1928 


-79- 


Dodd  has  emphasized  a  factor  v/nich  seems  to  be  one 
of  the  keynotes  of  the  situation — the  idea  that  this  lawless- 
ness is  not  a  recent  development  but  iias  existed  during  all  cur 
country's  liistory.    If  this  be  true,  then  Adains  is  not  speaking 
too  harsbJ.y  when  he  says  "Vthen  Americans  talk  about  their 
glorious  past,  it  aiay  be  y^'ell  for  them  to  remember  that  we  have 
one  of  th^cst  sinister  inheritances  in  this  matter  of  law- 
lessness from  which  any  civilization  could  suffer,  a  heritage 
which  we  are  apparently  passing  down  to  our  children  in  a  still 
worse  form."-K- 

In  view  of  these  damning  statements  it  wou  d  be  In- 
teresting to  survey  the  history^  of  our  country'"  to  see  whether 
or  not  ttds  is  justified.    Can  re  find  any  evidence  in  the  brief 
period  of  one  hundred  i.nd  fifty  five  years  w  ich  constitute  our 
separate  existance,  that  indicates  that  the  charge  is  we  1 
founded? 

An  exa.mination  of  the  early  his  tor.-  of  cur  country 
reveals  the  startling  fact  that  not  only  were  we  constant  law- 
breakers, from  the  very"  start  of  our  government,  but  that 
government  itself  'v/as  conceived  and  or^jani^ed  as  a  result  of  a 
distinctly  lawless  procedure;  in  X  a  ct  even  from  the  time  of 
the  first  settlements  the  old  law,  proving  a  hindrance  was  dis- 

J.T.Adams,  ">Jur  -lawless  ^'^er'tage",  Atlantic  ^io.ithly, 
December,  1326 


regarded.    The  old  Massachusetts  Bay  Colony,  itself,  started 
with  a  shadow  of  aishonesty: — the  charter  was  secretly  bri.ught 
tc  this  country,  with  the  intent  of  usin    it  as  a  Constitution 
for  a  self-governing  state  by  "misinterpreting"  it,  whereas  it 
was  only  intended  to  be  a  charter  of  incorporation.    The  great 
distance  between  the  colony  and  the  i^iother  Country  and  the 
diffic'.lty  of  comiunicption,  oade  it  easier  fcr  the  colony  to 
"get  away"  with  such  oractices. 

While  ijfraay  be  svid  in  excuse,  that  the  life  of  the 
early  colo:iists  was  of  such  a  type  that  it  demanded  that  the 
existing  laws  be  adapted  to  the  conditions  prevailing  and  that 
some times  in  order  to  survive,  it  vas  necessary  for  the  early 
settlers  to  be  a  "law  unto  themselves",  yet  t  is  idea  still 
prevailed  even  iiftsr  the  necessity  had  passed,  and  it  did  nave 
an  effect  on  v.eakening  the  respect  for  laws  in  general. 

Sometimes  when  it  was  really  dangerous  for  them  to  do 
so,  some  settlers,  more  daring  than  the  rest,  Vtfould  jush  into 
nev,-  territory  and  mark  out  homes  for  themselves.  Realizing 
that  this  seizing  of  territories  without  proper  parleying  with 
the  red  men,  who  were  the  origi  nal  owners  of  the  land,  meant 
an  inevitable  clash,  the  English  f-overnment  passed  a  law  that 
no  territory  was  to  be  occupied  until  the  government  had  made 
agreements  with  the  Indians  regarding  it.    The  colonists  ig- 
nored the  _aw,  even  T;hen  It  was  backed  up  by  their  own  popularly 
elected  Assemblies,  and  moved  into  whatever  territory  seemed 


-81- 


desirabls.    The  consequence  was  a  lawless  frontier  stretcl^ing, 
by  1776,  ail  the  way  froiii  New  Hampshire  to  Georgia.    Just  as 
the  English  had  predicted,  all  the  Indian  tribes  beyond  the 
Alleghanies  became  their  bitter  enemies. 

The  inevitable  result  of  tids  extreme  individualism 
was  the  growth  of  a  feeling  that  if  a  law  was  not  pleasant  it 
need  not  be  obeyed.    Particularly  in  this  early  Colonial 
period,  when  England  did  not  hf.ve  sufficient  force  present  in 
the  Colonies  to  enforce  her  regiiiatons,  this  feeling  grew 
rapidly . 

A  survey  of  this  Colonial  period  reveals  so  inany 
infrv.ctions  of  the  law  ihat  it  soaetimes  leads  one  to  wonder 
if  there  were  any  laws  that  were  ever  enforced.    Laws  restrict- 
ing trade  seemed  to  be  particularly  unpopular  and  consequently 
were  vjolated  extensively,    i'obacco  was  particularly 
valuable  commodity       it  co.ld  be  sold  in  the  Dutch  markets 

and  although  thJ.s  was  forbidden  by  the  "Mother  Country,  a  very 
profitable  trade  was  carried  on  in  this  product.    The  famous 
"three-cornered  tr  -de"  with  Africa  is  another  example  of  their 
characteristic  disregard  of  the  trade  laws.     "They  took  their 
product  to  the  forbidden  V<'sst  Indies;  got  gold,  or  rum,  went 
to  Africa  for  si  ves;  took  them  to  the  Southern  planters;  got 
sugar  W'-ich  they  cook,  to  New  England;  it  was  made  into  rum  and 

*    ¥».  E.  Dodd,    "Our  Ingrowing  %bit  of  -^avvlessness"  Century, 
October,  19E& 


sold  on  the  frontier  in  return  for  furs  and  skins. "-^ 

SoiUe  of  the  leaders  in  tr±s  type  of  trade  later  bscaae 
the  saints  of  American  history — such  as  Peter  Fanuael,  famous 
for  his  so-called  "Cradle  of  -ijiberty" — Fanuael  ^all. 

In  ace; .  .:.....ce  with  the  prevailin.^  colonial  policy 
of  that  time  England  passed  many  restrictions  which  were  un- 
doubtedly conceived  primarily  for  the  good  of  the  Mother  Country. 
One  such  law  was  that  relating  to  the  areas  set  aside  as  the 
"King's  ?)Oods.."    England  needed  :iuch  timber  for  the  ship  build- 
ing program  she  had  to  carry  on  if  she  were  to  maintain  her  .laval 
supremacy,  and  in  the  vast  forests  of  the  Aiaerican  colonies  there 
were  choice  woods  for  this  purpose.    Accordingly  certain  trees 
?'-9"  e  selected  by  the  official  surveyors  which  were  to  be  re- 
served for  tbe  use  of  the  royal  navy.    The  Colonists  needed 
trees  too — convenient  to  their  sliip  yards,  for  the  increasing 
number  of  ships  they  were  building  to  take  care  : f  the  profitable 
shipping  industry,  and  oftentimes  violence  vas  practiced  to 
force  the  surveyors  to  le  ve  the  trees  aloi^e. 

It  oiust  be  said  -'n  aefsn&e  of  the  s;jttlers,  however, 
that  in  some  instances  they  vvere  not  entirely  wrong  in 
taking  the  law  into  their  own  hands.    The  famous  Bacon 
Ftebellion  (1776)  might  be  almost  justified  on  the  grounds 
that  the  Western  pioneer  could  not  wait  for  the  slow  machinery 
of  the  Eastern  courts  to  operate — and  when  it  did  operate  it 


*  J.T.Adaas,  "^ur  i^awless  ^  erltage"    Atlantic  ^^onthly, 
December,  1928 


-85- 


was  so  ignorant  of  western  conditions  tht  it  often  seemed 
to  "be  unfair  to  them.    The  fact  remains,  nevertheless,  that 
it  did  not  have  a  healthy  effect  on  the  attitude  of  the  frontiers- 
men toward  any  law. 

Commenting  on  this  early  manifestation  of  lawlessness, 
Adams  brings  out  the  fact  that  all  law  r3sts  upon  one  or  more 
of  three  sanct  .ons  e(a.d  that  these  failing  the  law  will  not  be 
respected  nor  obeyed:    1.    the  dictum  of  some  supernaturel 
power.    2.    command  of  an  earthly  sovereign.    5.     consent  c:  the 
governed.    The  supernaturel  sanction  was  tried  in  the  ^^^ew 
England  theocracies  but  abandoned  as  unworkable;  the  authority 
of  the  king  was  not  pra  ctical-  he  v;as  too  far  away — so  tlrnt  was 
abandoned.    The  consent  of  the  governed — as  expressed  in  the 
New  England  town  meeting— was  left,  and  this  was  obeyed — but 
the  fact  that  the  Imperial  law"  was  disobeyed  v/eakened  its 
authority.* 

The  entire  Revolutionary  period  was  oiarked  by  acts 
which  were  in  direct  and  open  defiance  of  existing  laws,  cul- 
minating, of  course,  in  the  vrar  itself,  by  v^hich  the  country 
won  its  independence.    The  fact  th^t  many  of  these  acts  vrei-e 
done  by  ardent  patriots,  v»ho  if  they  stopped  to  rec.son  the  thing 
out  at  all,  doubtless  would  have  justified  their  acts  on  the 

*    J.  T.  Adams,  "gur  -lawless  Heritage."    Atlantic  ii^onthly, 
December,  1928 


-84- 


grounds  of  the  "ends  justified  the  niieans",  hf:s  brought  them 
down  to  our  ovm  times  colored  with  much  glamour  and  romance — yet 
undoubtedly,  coupled  with  the  great  spirit  of  individualism  so 
rife  at  that  time,  they  did  much  to  contribute  to  our  present 
lax  attitude  toward  law  observance,  and  street  fighting 

charticterized  the  days  before  and  during  the  war — the  Boston 
Massacre  and  Boston  Tea  ^arty  v*eie  demonstrations  of  lawless- 
ness that  present  day  historians  are  less  apt  to  condone  than 
has  been  the  case  in  the  past. 

Hot  many  pec pie  realize  that  d  ring  tils  period  people 
did  not  allow  courts  to  sit — Sss^jx  and  Middlesex  ^ere  the  only 
coTiiities  in  Massachusetts  where  sessions  were  held,    Cn  all 
sides  came  complaints  that  "contempt  for  authority  and 
general  unwillingness  to  submit  to  law  prevailed."* 

Following  the  P^volut '  on  the  people  who  b^,d  felt 
justified  in  violating  so  many  laws  in  order  to  secure  their 
independence  were  faced  with  the  necessity  of  making  some  laws 
of  their  own  to  £:overn  themselves  w  .th.    Immediately  they  ran 
up  against  that  extreme  individualjan  that  disliked  restraint 
of  any  kind.    It  was  obviously  necessary  to  r-iise  money  to 
carry  on  the  government,  bu^no  one  seemed  willing  to  be 
taxed  for  that  purpose.    "No  taxation  without  representation" 
was  changed,  by  implication  at  least,  to  "I^o  taxation  at  all." 

-"'•H.B.Faialkner,  "An  Econcalc  ^'istcr^'-  of  United  States,  P.  195 


-bo- 


One  great  trouble  was  that  the  var -  us  sections  of  the 
country  were  so  isolated  that  they  felt  ao  common  interest  nor 
reason  for  giving  up  anything  for  e. ch  other.    Since  union 
meant  iievitably,  a  compr.  mise  in  order  to  secure  the  greatest 
good  for  everybody,  it  naturally  followed  th£.t  some  laws  must 
be  iiiade  for  th-e  good  of  all  wr.ich  would  'be  irksome  to  a  portion 
of  the  people.    The  unwillingness  to  coop3rate  strongly  marked 
this  troublous  period  in  our  early  histoiy."^^^ 

During  the  war  of  1812,  we  find  other  examples  of 
the  way  '.n  which  the  people,  appare.itly  v/ith  no  compunction, 
broke  their  own  laws  if  it  sv^ited  their  individual  desires. 

England,  whose  shipping  suffered  from  the  restrictions  of 
the  Embargo  and  ^^on-Inter course  Acts  sailed  her  fast  ships  into 
any  ports  th^t  offered  good  trading,  charging  off  the  losses 
of  seized  sliips  against  the  enormous  profits  whj.ch  such  trade 

brought  in.^--    In  fact  the  busiaets  became  core  lucrative 
than  the  lawful  trade  of  the  previous  years. 

The  slavery  question  which  aroused  such  a  storm  of 
trouble  all  over  the  country  between  1&S5  and  1660,  w^;s  one 
of  many  factors  in  wrdch  can  be  detected  traces  of  lawlessness. 
As  -^rlowe  has  said,  it  was  a  period  of  great  s.£itation.  He 
felt  that  it  was  a  product  of  tl.e  American  Revolution.  "In 
the  50 'e  and  40 's  the  pe..ple  in  charge  of  affairs  had  as 
children  iistenea  to  their  grandfathers  as  these  old  veterc.ns 

^  C.  5.  Dodd,  "Our  Ingrowing  i^abit  of  -lawlessness"  Centiiry 
October,  1928 

h. S.Faulkner,  An  Economic  ^istory  of  the  ^J.S.    P,  197 


-86- 


retold  the  stories  of  the  revolutionary  days  of  '76.  Brought 
up  in  the  atiaospnere  of  rebe  lion  they  were  filled  with  a 
fierce  imxilse  to  attack  ."^^omething,  anything,  no  matter  rhat."^ 
This  spirit  tended  to  iaa<e  people  too  impatient  to  wait  for  the 
"slow  wheels  of  justice" — they  felt  that  they  must  take  inattsrs 

into  their  own  hands — and  there  wers/iflany  causes  for  friction 
in  these  early  days  which  necessitated  some  kind  of  adjustment. 
Intolerance  was  rife^  race  hatred  keen;  altogether  the  atti- 
tudes of  the  people  of  th-t  time  present  a  rather  sorry  picture. 

Ai  illustration  of  the  fierce  intolerance  and  race 
hatred  so  clmrecteristic  of  the  time  is  found  in  the  persecution 
cf  the  Irish  and  Catholic  people  between  1855  azid  1855  es- 
pecially.   The  negroes  were  the  objects  of  abuse,  also.  In 
Philadelpha  thirty  houses  were  burned  or  sacked.    A  church  was 
pulled  down  and  several  people  killed. 

In  Illinois  one  of  the  Abolitionists,  a  strong  be- 
liever in  free  speech,  a  ---an  by  the  name  of  ijovejoy,  was  killed 
by  a  mob,  who  three  his  printing  presses  into  the  river. 
William  Lloyd  Garrison  vvas  dragged  through  the  streets  of 
Boston  by  a  .aob  and  probably  would  have  been  killed  had  not 
the  j-overnor  h-d  him  put  in  jail.-^-  -^ 

In  the  Reconstruction  days  in  the  i^outh  lynching  was 
a  co.rimon  .)ractice.    I'he  ?vlu  Klux  ^■>-lan  was  organized  in  lo86 
in  an  attempt  to  stem  the  terrible  corruption  resulting  from 

-J^Harlowe,  "The  Growth  of  the  United  States.,  ?.  289 

-«-"-See  Nevins,  Social  ^^istory  as  Recorded  by  British  Travelers 

for  further  illustratons .    Cha-.ter  2,  P.  64 

■j^-j-^William  LLoyd  Garrison,  His  ^ife  and  Times,  Johnson 


"carpet  bag"  and  aewly  enfranchised  negro  government,  which 
sprang  up  in  tliat  section  as  a  resiilt  of  the  stupid  way  that 
Congress  attempted  to  handle  the  situation.    The  attitude  of  this 
time  is  revealed  in  the  comment  of  a  Southern  judge  who  said 
"i  wo'old  stuff  a  ballot  box  in  order  to  have  a  good,  honest, 
government. 

Undoubtedly  the  conditions  were  bad  enough  to  warrant 
drastic  action  ana  yet  it  can  not  be  denied  that  such  situations 
ao  no1|raake  for  a  feeling  of  respect  for  law. 

Following  the  Reconstruction  -^er  .od  we  find  another 
per  od  of  lawlessness — in  connection  with  the  groy;th  of  big 
business,  which  developed  at  this  time.'""^      The  disgraceful 
"Credit  idobelier"  scheme  connected  with  the  construction  of  the 
Union  -^^acific  Railroad,  was  only  one  instance  wher.^:  the  laws  were 
evaded  and  the  law  itself  brought  into  disrepute  because  of  the 
corrupTion  of  the  people  to  v.hom  the  task  of  governing  the 
country  was  given. 

Coming  up  to  our  own  day  v?e  find  still  further 
evidence  that  this  same  feeling  still  exists.    Mob  violence  is 
still  found.    During  the  last  war  Fritz  Kriesler,  the  famous 
violinist  was  prevented  from  playing  at  a  concert  because  of 
the  mob  which  gathered.->^->-Jf- 

■«-Harlowe,  The  ^owth  of  the  united  States,    P.  548 

H  U.  Faulkner,  "An  Economic  History  of  the  United  States, 
P.  594 

■JHHt  "Situation  we  are  in  -nd  ti.e  Tfay  Out"    Ngrth  America 
Septemoer,  1925    Pp.  7?-8    Vol.  22Z 


-86- 


While  undoubtedly  the  heaviest  blame  for  our  present 
situa"olon  must  be  ciiarged  to  what  Adams  ^as  called  "our  lawless 
heritage",  as  the  foregoing  discussion  would  indicate,  yet  that 
does  not  mean  that  there  are  no  other  factors  of  gree.t  importance 
as  well.    One  ver;^'"  inpcrtant  factor  is  becoa  n;i  of  increasingly 
great  irapcr :.ance---oiar  present  day  "pass  :.on  for  law  making." 
Hadley  feels  that  one  of  the  "greatest  dangers  w'.'lch  now  con- 
fronts us  is  tl'.e  increasing  demand  for  ill-considered  legislation 
and  the  increasing  readiness  of  would-be  reformers  to  rely  on 
authority  rather  than  on  public  sentiment  to  gain  their  ends."^- 

He  suggests  that  if  a  la?/  seems  Throng  that  it  would 
seem  justifiable  to  "nullify"  it  by  not  obeying  it.    He  points 
out,  however,  that  ti.'ds  is  dangerous,  for  if  a  good  man  breaks 
a  bad  law  under  pressure  of  necessity,  it  y»111  encourage  another 
ma:i  who  is  not  good,  to  break  seve  £.1  other  laws  iA"bich  may  not 
be  bad  at  all. 

He  feels  that  "until  the  representative  recognizes 
that  his  office  is  a  pub  ic  trust  and  he  must  bring  to  it  his 
best  tliinking,  not  allowing  himself  to  be  sv/ayed  by  personal 
considerations,  there  will  continue  to  be  cases  when  the  devoted 
lover  of  self-government  will  often  have  to  choose  between  the 
danger  of  lawlessness  which  res..l-&s  from  ignoring  a.  statute,  and 
the  danger  of  tyranny  which  is  involved  in  passive  obedience . 

Gernily  criticizes  sharply  the  idea  that  laws  rnay  be 

"noble  experiments",  on  the  grounds  that  we  should  not  experiaent 

-;-A.T. Hadley,  Harpers  '^'agazine,  '•November,  1925    "Law  "*aking  and 
Law  Enforcement, 
same 


-89- 

with  anything  as  dangerous  and  far  rercidng  as  ths.t.    He  feels 
that  things  should  be  tested  as  far  as  possible  before  being 
incorporated  into  a  law.    "If  ycu  wish  to  test  a  new  serum", 
he  says,  "you  do  not  inoculate  the  entire  population."    So  with 
laws,  they  should  be  tried  out  more  carefu_Lly,  in  smaller  groups 
if  possible,  before  they  are  made  into  laws. 

lihile  many  people  would  not  agree  absolutely  w  th 
him  on  that  score,  yet  probably  everyone  will  agree  ths^t  our 
"passion  for  law  aaking"  should  be  curbed  to  an  extent  vvhere 
more  rational  thought  Ttill  be  given  to  this  very  vital  matter. 

Another  suggestion  has  been  advanced  by  Adams,  when 
he  says  that  we  must  throw  overboard  thayold  idea,  inherited 
from  our  ?uritan  forebears,  th...t  if  anything  is  wrong,  niake  a 
law  to  stop  it — thc.l^s  force  your  ideas  on  the  community  in  the 
form  of  a  law  and  then  th^ere  presence  of  the  law  7/ill  .i-ake 
them  better.    The  intimation  is  thi  t  even  if  a  law  is  not  ob- 
served its  presence  on  the  statute  books  will  show  that  the 
idea  has  some  standing. 

Because  the  majority  do  not  take  much  interest  in  law 
making  it  is  possible  for  a  minority  to  get  a  law  passed 
sometimes  and  then  the  ethers  vvon't  obey  it.    -^n  other  words 
"Because  we  '.iave  no  respect  for  law  v/e  allow  any  sort  of  law  to 
be  passed  and  then—  the  vicious  circle  continuing — our  disrespect 
increases  as  more  bad  laws  are  passed." 

*-R.  F.  Germly,  "our  Passion  for  Law  taking"    Harpers  aflagazine 
November,  19<:8 

J.T.Ada.is,  "Our  Lawless  "eritage,  Atlantic  ^onthly,  Dec.  1926 


-30- 


Lord  '^culton,  in  his  stimulating  discussion  of 
the  topic  "Law  and  %nners"  reveals  indirectly  another  reason 
why  we  are  confronted  with  this  great  civic  shortage. ->^- 

According  to  his  theoiy  there  are  three  great  domains 
of  human  action:     1.    the  d(.;main  of  positive  lav?,  where  our 
actions  are  precribed  by  lav>  binding  upon  us  which  must  be 
obeyed.    2.    the  domain  of  free  choice,  wrdch  includes  all 
those  actions  :.£  to  which  we  claim  and  enjoy  complete  freedom. 
"But  beyond  these  two  there  is  a  tliird  large  and  important 
domain  in  which  their  r  J-es  neither  p-'Sitive  law  nor  absolute 
freedom.    In  that  domain  the^e  is  no  lav;  ^vhich  inexorably 
determines  cur  course  of  action  and  yet  we  feel  th::.t  we  are  :ot 
free  to  do  just  as  we  would."    He  calls  it  the  "domain  of 
manners."    His  implication  is  that  that  field  rests  on  an 
appreciation  of  the  fact  that  great  pr  v«leges  inevitably 
cariy  with  them  added  responsibilities;  until  people  realize 
this  eternal  truth  they  can  not  handle  this  field  successfully. 
In  England,  for  example,  with  its  hundreds  of  years  of  precedent, 
there  has  developed  tnis  "middle  ground"  to  such  an  extent  tha^t 
there  are  mny  things  which  no  cne  wo  ;ld  thinx  of  doing,  even 
though  there  is  no  law  against  it.    It  just  "isn't  done." 

The  intimation  is  that  in  a  young  country  this 
feeling  is  not  yet  developed,  hence  in  tnis  country  we  tend, 
where  we  do  not  bs.ve  positive  lav^  to  indulge  in  "free  choice" 

*The  Atlantic  ^nthly,  July,  1924 


to  the  extent  rrnere  773  are  anti-social. 

Our  anal7sis  of  tiiis  situat  on,  then,  would  tend  to 
show  us  that  while  there  are  many  and  varied  causes  and  ex- 
planations to  account  for  our  shortages  in  this  matter  of 
law  abidingness,  that  they  really  co  .Id  be  divided  into  two 
types:     1.    our  lawless  history,  based  on  an  exaggerated  in- 
dividualism, has  given  us  a  "spirit  of  lawlessness"    2  our 
pass  on  for  law  iHaking  has  led  us  to  pass  unwise  laws,  which 
res  Ited  in  lack  of  respect  for  all  laws. 

^nowing  our  weaknesses  in  tbJLs  direct  on,  can  we 
find  a  remedy? 


-92- 

Chapter  i:'ourte9n 
Can  Religious  Teachings  Eliminate  This  Shortage? 

Yif'hen  we  analysed  the  reaso  is  for  the  many  cases  of 
lawlevssness  in  our  histoiy  vre  realized  that  rauch  of  it  sprang 
from  an  exagerrated  sense  of  individualism  which  was  almost 
inevitable  in  a  p'..oneering  era,  but  Trhich  can  serve  no  useful 
purpose  in  our  :aore  complex  civilizat  on  of  today — in  fact  it 
would  be  fatal  to  our  ^ell-beiag.      If  we  of  today  were  as 
independent  and  self-sufficient  as  were  those  early  people, 
we  might  have  some  reason  for  being  as  individualistic,  but, 
living  as  we  do  in  a  highly  interdependent  stage,  we  murt  ac- 
cept the  obligations  together  with  the  priveleges  of  such  a 
situation.    7ihat  we  need  to  do  then,  is  to  substitute  for  this 
extreme  individualism  which  prevails,  a  seise  of  cooperation. 
We  need  to  stress  those  two  elements  of  good  conduct  which 
Hartshorne  and  May  studied  in  their  survey — service  and  self- 
control,  which  are  the  direct  antithesis  of  this  over-indi- 
vidualistic outlook.    If  we  CO  .;1q  do  th-is  we  could  mitigate 
to  a  great  extent  that  influence  that  our  heritage  has  given 
us. 

Can  we  find  any  specific  evidence  that  there  is  any- 
thing in  our  program  cf  religious  teaching  which  would  develop  . 
this  cooperative  feeling? 

An  analysis  of  the  five  different  courses  of  study 
which  we  presented  in  a  survey  of  the  religious  teachings 


-95- 

given  by  various  a=  ancles,  revealed  the  fact  that  all  of  thern 
stressed  very  strongly  txiis  idea  of  "service."    Through  use  of 
Biblical  materials  which  stress  this  idea:  through  the  story  of 
the  service  rendered  by  the  church  and  by  great  h-roes  of  all 
time,  these  courses  sho  id  do  much  to  stimulate  the  feeling  that 
"service"  oiust  be  the  keynote  of  any  world  that  is  to  endure. 

In  our  discussion  of  the  rsligious  teachings  gained  : 
through  other  agencies  than  the  church  school,  we  brought  out 
the  fact  that  '-n  the  Young  People's  Institutes  and  summer 
conferences  th-is  idea  of  service  received  very  great  and 
effective  emphasis. 

It  would  seem,  therefore,  as  if  religious  teachings 
could  do  much  toward  eliminating  this  shortage.    However,  the 
attempt  will  be  comparatively  futile  if  the  church  is  asked  to 
carry  the  burden  alone — that  is  until  the  school,  the  home  and 
other  agencies  cooperate  to  the  end  that  these  teachings  which 
have  such  dynq!(jic  possibilities  can  be  gotten  across  to  the 
young  people  through  a  well  planned  and  well  adjoinistered  program 
which  will  go  beyond  the  tr.aditional  Sunday  Church  School  or- 
ganization, we  can  not  hope  that  these  teacrdngs  will  function 
to  any  great  extent. 

Can  anytiiing  be  done  to  overcome  the  other  cause  of 
our  shortage — our  pass /on  for  law  .-naking?  Is  that  beyond  the 
province  of  rel-gioas  teaching  or  can  it  offer  something  that 
will  help  in  this  situation  also?      Some  people  feel  that 


-94- 


religion  should  keep  entirely  clear  of  anything  that  savors 
of  politics;  it  is  her  province  to  instill  the  right  ideals 
in  her  people  Yrliich  T.dll  enable  them  to  take  part  in  this 
phase  of  their  civic  living,  wisely,  rather  than  interfering 
directly.       But  v.'ith  the  growing  emphasis  on  the  "social 
message"  of  religion,  it  not  on^y  can, but  actually  is, doing 
something  to  help. 

Probably  inany  of  the  questionable  laws  which  crowd 
our  statute  books  were  placed  there  either  because  people 
did  not  understand  the  situation  and  so  legislated  unwisely, 
or  were  too  indifferent  to  the  whole  situation  to  protest 
against  their  representatives  passing  laws  w'  ich  did  lot 
represent  the  welfare  of  the  majority  of  the  people. 

Undoubtedly  the  sin  of  ignorance  must  bear  the 
larger  share  of  the  blame  for  once  people  realize  the  signifi- 
cance and  vital  importance  of  a  situation,  indifference  is  no 
longer  a  factor  to  worry  about. 

V.'e  find  in  the  field  of  religious  teachings    an  in- 
creasing emphasis  on  these  social  problems,  an  understanding 
of  which  should  resjlt  in  more  intelligent  action  legislative- 
ly.   As  Coe  has  pointed  out  "the  church  has  turned  mors  and 
more  in  the  last  two  decades  to  social  needs  and  problems. 
lihen  the  Vv'ebb-iCenyon  CMld  J-iabor  bill  was  pending  in  the 
House  of  Representatives  a  Sunday  School  class  of  boys  sent 
to  the  Congressman  from  their  district    a  request  that  he 


-95- 

support  the  measure.    At  the  baginning  of  this  century  probably 

no  Sunday  School  studied  such  matters  but  today  topics  like 
this  seem  to  be  entirely  familiar  in  the  church. 

However,  he  did  not  imply  that  things  could  not  be 
improved  upon — the  significant  thing  in  the  axample  cited  was 
that  it  marked  a  beginning — a  recognition  of  the  fact  that 
here  was  a  phase  of  life  hitherto  neglected  w'aich  religion 
should  touch. 

Coe  feels  keenly  that  the  best  way  to  get  at  the 
truth  of  a  situation  is  not  to  hush  all  critical  coinraent  but 
to  welcome  it  as  a  means  of  testing  the  validity  of  the 
thing  criticised.    He  believes  that  the  church  must  develop 
the  b-abit  of  free  soci>^.l  criticism-  must  realize  that  con- 
structive criticism  is  essential  to  progress. 

While  to  date  it  can  not  be  pointed  out  that 
religious  teachings  h^.ve  eliminated  these  very  outstanding 
civic  shortages,  which  are  such  a  stumbling  block  in  the  way 
of  attaining  our  ideal  of  better  civic  reactions,  yet  the 
trend  is  so  distinctly  in  the  direction  of  their  mitigation, 
even  their  elimination,  that  we  may  expect  to  find  in  the 
not  too  far  distant  future  that  it  can  no  longer  be  said 
of  us  that  we  are  the  most  lawless  nation  in  the  world. 


*G.  A.  Coe  "Religious  education  and  Political  Conscience" 
Teachers  College  Record,  Vol.  XXIII,  September,  1922 


BOOK  FIVE 


A  SUi&i/lAEI  MD  SOME  CONCLUSIONS 


-96- 

Chapter  -i^ifteen 
A  Sunuiiaiy  and  Some  Conclusions 

Is  religious  teaching  the  most  pcv/erful  dynamic  we 
know  to  secure  social  and  civic  conduct?    As  a  result  cf  our 
questioning  among  the  various  sources  we  have  tapped,  the 
answer  would  seem  to  be  "Yes."    Ps  chologists  find  that  the 
concept  it  would  give  is  an  impetus  to  right  action  that  is 
unsurpassed;  in  the  curricula  of  the  church,  the  public  and 
private  school,  and  other  organizations,  v/e  find  elements  of 
teaching  which,  in  varying  degree,  tend  when  properly  carried 
out,  to  give  these  vital  concepts;  the  new  and  rapidly  develop- 
ing field  of  testing  is  contributing  to  the  effectiveness  of 
teaching  by  serving  as  a  check  on  results  which  will  aid  in 
developing  improved  methods  cf  presenta  Aon;  so  from  many 
sources  do  we  find  evidence  that  religious  teaching  is  a 
thing  to  be  reckoned  with  in  the  formation  of  character. 

Vihat  significance  does  this  hold  for  us  as  educators? 
Is  there  any  tiling  we  can  and  should  do  about  it? 

If  one  of  our  primary  aims  is  to  make  good  citizens, 
one  of  the  fundamental  characterisitics  of  which  is  that 
social  and  civic  conduct  which  enables  them  to  live  together 
in  harmonious  relationships,  and  religious  teaching  is  one  of 
the  most  powerful  factors  in  moulding  such  character,  then 
the  inevitable  conclusion  seems  to  be  that  here  is  something 
we  can  not  afford  to  ignore  if  we  are  to  accomplish  our  aim. 


-97- 


Since  one  of  the  great  difficulties  connected  with 
religious  teachings  seems  to  be  the  problem  of  how  to  get  it 
^  across  to  more  of  our  people  In  a  more  satisfactory  manner,  we 

as  teachers  should  offer,  tiir.ugh  any  of  the  agencies  which 
seem  to  us  best,  to  cooperate  to  the  fullest  extent  in  order 
that  this  difficulty  may  be  lessened.    As  long  as  seven  out 
of  every  ten  people  in  the  country  receive  no  teaching  of 
this  sort  whatever,  how  can  we  expect  the  tliree  who  do  get  it 
to  carry  on  against  such  a  majority?    And  how  can  ?;e  expect  the 
other  seven  to  becoiae  interested  unless  ve  improve  the  method 
of  presentation? 

Obviously  the  schools,  touching  life  at  so  many 
angles  as  it  does  now,  is  in  a  position  to  help  religious 
teaching  both  directly  and  indirectly,  and  this  without 
sacrificing  any  of  our  fundamental  belief  that  there  should  be 
entire  separation  of  church  and  state. 

How  this  can  be  done  has  already  been  hinted  at — in 
a  coo  -erative  program  undoubtedly  lies  the  solution  of  the 
problem.    Athearn  feels  ths-.t  the  United  States  will  have  a 
system  of  moral  training  for  her  ch-ildren  inside  of  ten 
years. -J^    It  will  include  aot  only  such  character  education  as 
can  be  taught  in  the  public  schools,  but  will  go  beyond  and  spon- 
sor various  ty^ses  of  religious  teaching  through  the  churches 

W 

Vi.S. Athearn,  "Character  Building  in  a  Democracy"    P.  12 


working  in  cooperation  with  the  school,    -^n  order  to  maintain 
a  Christian  Democracy,  Athearn  states,  where  church  and  state 
are  separate,  ve  must  have  a  complete  "educafonal  arch",  one 
side  of  which  will  consist  of  the  state  supported  schools  and 
the  other  side  church  supported  educational  institutions  of 
the  same  grade  and  qualitj''  as  the  secular  schools,  working  in 
cooperation  y.'ith  them  to  achieve  the  best  results.    The  state 
lias  a  good  system  of  elementary,  secondary,  collegiate,  and 
graduate  schools,  with  teacher  training  institutions  to  train 
teachers  and  supervisors,  to  see  that  the  work  is  carried  on; 
the  church  needs  just  such  a  system.    That  of  course  implies 
more  than  the  one  hour  on  Sunday,  more  than  the  vacation  day 
school,  if  the  church  is  to  .aaintain  a  system  of  tliis  type. 
If  religious  teaching  is  of  such  importance  it  deserves  a  par  t 
of  the  school  day  of  the  child.    The  school,  it  is  felt  by 
some,  is  demanding  too  much  of  the  cliild's  time — it  is  not 
fair  to  expect  the  church  to  .aake  adequate  headway  if  it  must 
salvage  a  few  moments  out  of  the  meagre  leisure  left  to  the 
child.    Yi/hen  the  school  Y,'ill  lend  its  hearty  support  to 
sponsoring  such  a  program  then  can  the  church  appeal  to  more 
tb^n  three  out  of  every  ten  young  people,  and  then  can  the 
country  expect  from  the  church  the  res  Its  that  are  so 
necessary. 

To  actually  go  as  far  as  is  necessary  in  religious 
teaching  is  impossible  for  the  schools  in  a  democracy;  to 
give  over  all  her  educa!:4onal  vork  to  various  churches  denies 


-9S- 


the  children  that  unity  of  f seling  which  a  common  body  of 

knowledge  and  attitudes,  such  as  can  be  gained  in  the  public 

school  gives  J  to  expect  the  church  to  loake  adeo.uate  headway 

with  one  hour  a  reek  sched;^es  is  folly;  hence  the  school  day 

must  be  shared  with  the  church  so  that  it  may  carry  on  its 

part  of  the  work  efficiently  and  effectively. 

Such  plans  as  the  ^"^alden  plan,  the  Gary  plan,  the 

Wenner  plan,  calling  for  one  hour  each  school  day,  or  even 
in 

less  ^ome  instances  only  three  of  the  five  school  days  are 
asked  for)  seem  to  be  the  logical  solution  of  the  problem,  1% 
is  not,  however,  a  ciiange  that  can  be  made  in  an  hour,  "ntil 
people  as  a  whole  feel  the  imperative  aeed  for  religious 
teaching,  and  realize  tliat  the  church  can  offer  it  in  this 
way,  they  will  not  give  this  new  movement  the  whole-hearted 
support  that  it  needs. 

When  public  school  leaders  swing  into  line  v^ith 
this  challenging  task,  then  v/ill  v/e  find  that  the  schools  will 
be  able  to  achieve  to  a  far  greater  degree,  one  aim  to  which, 
as  builders  of  a  true  democracy,  they  are  committed — the  ideal 
of  making  people,  who  know  how  to  'live  together  Trail  in  large 
group  relationships." 

The  End. 


-lOQ- 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 
Books 

Athearn,  Vvalter  Scott:    Character  Building  in  a  De  locracy 
New  ^ork         iiacmillan  1924 

Athearn,  TJulter  Scott:    Religicus  Education  and  American 

Democracy. 
Boston  Pilgrim  Press 

Berkowitz,  Henrj'-:    The  i^ew  Education  in  Religion 
Philadelphia  Jewish  Chautauqua  1915 

Betts,  George  Herbert:    The  ^^ew  ■''rogram  of  Religious  Education 
Ne?:  ^ork    Methodist  Boo:c  Concern  1921 

Brooks,  Fowler  D.:    Psychology  of  Adolescence 
Boston    Houghton,  Mifflin  Co.     1929  * 

Butler,  Nicholas  'Murray:    The  Meaning  of  Education 
New  York    Scribners      1915  -''^ 

Coe,  George  Albert:    V.hat  is  Christian  Education 

New  ?ork    Scribners  1929 

Coe,  George  Albert:    Social  Theory  of  Religious  Education 
New  York      Scribners  1917 

Coe,  George  Albert:     Education  in  Religion  and  wlorals 
New  York    Revell  Co.  i904 

Faulkner,  Harold  Underwood:    Araerican  Scononaic  History 
New  York      Harper's  1924 

(Especially  chapter  on  background  of  Civil  1/Var,?  197 
See  index  for  further  references  to  "lawlessness") 

Harlovy"e,  r^alph  Volney:    The  Growth  of  the  linited  States 
New  York      Holt  1925 

(Good  discussion  of  lawlessness  durin?  r^-e  construct  ion 
Period.  P. 548  and  on.) 

Hartshcrne,  Hugh  a  \d  ^y,  ivlark  A:     Studies  in  Deceit    Volume  One 

Studies  in  Service  and 
Self  Control    Volume  Two 
Studies  in  the  Organization 
of  Character    Volume  Tlu^ee 
New  York     Macmillan    Vol.  1  &  I  1926-29 

Vol.  ?    1950  * 


-101- 


Nevins,  Allan:    American  Social  History  as  Recorded  by 
Brit"  sh  Travellers 
New  York      Holt  1925 
(Especially  Chapter  2,  but  entire  book  gives  good 
picture  of  lawless  conditions  in  esrly  times) 

Smith,  H.  -tt-ugustine,  editor:    w'ew  Hyinnal  for  Aiaerican  -^outh 
I'Jew  York         Centuiy  Company  1930 
(See  especially  sections  on  "World  Friendship"; 
"'i'orchbdarers" ,  and  "Prayers  and  High  Resolves"  and 
"Devotional  ^ oetrj""  and  ^ rose"  in  back  of  book) 

Snedden,  D^vid:    Civic  Education 

i^ew  iork         World  Book  Company  1922 

Thompson,  Olive:    A" Guide  to  Readings  in  Civic  Education 
Ber.celev,  Cal.    University  cf  California  Press  1924 
(See  especially  Part  5,  Section  5) 

Vieth,  Paul  H. :    Teacliing  for  Ciiristian  •'-'iving 
St.  Louis      Bethany  -"^ress  1929 

Watson,  Goodwin  B.:      Experimentation  and  Measurement  in 

Religi  us  Education 
New  York         Association  Press       1927  ^- 


*    Indicates  that  entire  book  was  helpful. 

Insert:    Betts,  George  Herbert,  6.  Siselen,  i.C.  & 

Coe,  G.  A.,  editors.:  Religion  and  Conduct — 
A  Report  of  a  Conference  held  at  Northwestern 
University 

Abingdon  ?ress      1950      New  ^ork 


-102- 


Periodicals 

Adaas,  J.  T.    "Our  Lavrless  ner  .tage"    Atlantic  i«ionthly 
Volume  142      December,  192b 

Dodd,  Vi,  "Our  Ingrowing  tiabit  of  Lawlessness" 

Century  -^ag-zine,  October,  1928    Pp.  691-8 

Germly,  K.  "Our  Fassion  for  ijaw  "taking"    iiarpers  Magazine 

November,  1928 

Hadley,  Arthur  T.:     "Lav/  Making  and  Law  Snforcement" 
Harpers  ^'^agazine,  November,  1925 

Howarth,  I.  V^,:     "Teaching  of  Patriotism"    Educational  Rgview 
May,  1924 

International  Journal  cf  Religious,  November,  1928,.  Editorial 
article 

Journal  of  Religious  Education,  January,  1951,  Editorial  article 

Moulton,  Lord:     "Laws  and  banners"    Atlantic  ^^gnthly,  July,  1924 

Snedden,  David:     "Good  Citizenship — how  Good?" 
Educational  Review,  xiiarch,  1925 

Bulletins ,  Monographs ,  Pamphlets ,  Etc. 

The  Art  of  Living,    Boston  Y.  M.  0.  A.  1950 

Encyclical  on  Education  of  Women    Issued  by  Pope  Pius  XI, 
January  19,  1951 

The  Essential  Place  cf  Religion  in  Education,  National 
Education  Association,    January,  1916 

Preliminar'/'  Report  of  the  Comiss  iron,  iiiiessage  and  Purpose  of 

Y.M.G.  A.:    National  Council  of  the  Y.M.C.A.,  November  17,1950 

The  Teaching  ^^flinistry  of  the  Church,  Keith,  G.C.,    Elliot  Church 
Brochure  Series,  Elliot  Church,  l^est  Roxbury 


I